Re: HTTP response question.

From	Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.ruby
Subject	Re: HTTP response question.
Date	2015-12-22 11:55 +0100
Message-ID	<ddsohvFamlbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<slrnn7cre2.9m0.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu> <slrnn7d4u4.bsj.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu> <ddnnphF272hU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7f9du.2g5.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu>

Show all headers | View raw

On 21.12.2015 08:09, Michael Uplawski wrote:

> But my *supersede* was posted in between my original posting and the
> response that you gave. Anyway, as supersedes do not work reliably
> everywhere, I could just as well abandon the practice and leave my typos
> intact in the future...

Intact typos vs. broken (= fixed) typos - that is hilarious! :-)

> The server, that I currently use to read the news as delivered a
> double message, too.

OK, then technology fooled me.  Thanks for clarification!

> I saw your response and thank you very much, as always.

You're welcome.

Cheers

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

HTTP response question. Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2015-12-20 09:58 +0100
  Re: HTTP response question. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:03 +0100
    Re: HTTP response question. Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2015-12-24 08:46 +0100
  Re: HTTP response question. Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2015-12-20 12:40 +0100
    Re: HTTP response question. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-12-20 14:12 +0100
      Re: HTTP response question. Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2015-12-21 08:09 +0100
        Re: HTTP response question. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-12-22 11:55 +0100

csiph-web