Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Subject: Re: HTTP response question.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:55:58 +0100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ddsohvFamlbU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <slrnn7cre2.9m0.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu> <slrnn7d4u4.bsj.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu> <ddnnphF272hU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7f9du.2g5.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net t01EginMNo1iKdE36Q0NAQAvPmRcwbfE8cgBCBq2pfxu1ceeI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:THOppHSWuAa8aPqhyQ4adVAfjZA=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
In-Reply-To: <slrnn7f9du.2g5.michael.uplawski@drusus.uplawski.eu>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.ruby:7171

On 21.12.2015 08:09, Michael Uplawski wrote:

> But my *supersede* was posted in between my original posting and the
> response that you gave. Anyway, as supersedes do not work reliably
> everywhere, I could just as well abandon the practice and leave my typos
> intact in the future...

Intact typos vs. broken (= fixed) typos - that is hilarious! :-)

> The server, that I currently use to read the news as delivered a
> double message, too.

OK, then technology fooled me.  Thanks for clarification!

> I saw your response and thank you very much, as always.

You're welcome.

Cheers

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/