Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.rec.sheds > #370409
| From | "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.rec.sheds |
| Subject | Re: Prostate State |
| Date | 2023-10-27 15:08 +0100 |
| Organization | Salmeron and Malabuyoc |
| Message-ID | <dUkINlAOR8OlFAN2@salmiron.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <uhasti$n87c$1@dont-email.me> <275236382.720023397.253466.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <XnsB0A9A77BA4896Factura3476@135.181.20.170> <20231026170120.afc1b3dbf07eeb324219ffa2@eircom.net> <kq1u0vFtfa7U4@mid.individual.net> |
In article <kq1u0vFtfa7U4@mid.individual.net>, chrisnd @ukrm <chrisnd@privacy.net> on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 14:58:55 awoke Nicholas from his slumbers and wrote >On 26/10/2023 17:01, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:27:50 -0000 (UTC) >> Peter <myshed@prune.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> NHS says that while herbal remedies are heavily advertised, there is >>> little scientific evidence that they work well. Saw palmetto has >>> some evidence that it helps, but it is not conclusive. It may be worth a >>> try if symptoms are mild. >> >> One of the catches with this sort of thing is that nobody is going >> to stump up for clinical trials on something they can't patent and compared >> to a proper clinical trial nothing that gets done for a research paper is >> even close to conclusive. >> >> We got lucky with aspirin there would be no hope of getting it >> trialled under today's regime. OTOH the poster child for the need for good >> clinical trials is of course thalidomide - nobody wants another one like >> that. >> >> My take - if it does no harm then it's worth a try but if there's >> evidence or even strong indications that it causes its own problems steer >> well clear. >> >I saw a Hansard transcription today that suggests the Covid vaccines >have led to a large upsurge in 'extra deaths'* - notably in 2021 - and >that statistics have been 'massaged' to make this less obvious. >I am a great believer in the principle of vaccination but rushed/lack of >sufficient trials always had the possibility of an unexpected surge in >something. > >Chris >*Ie non-covid itself debunked https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0gj8frd -- 0sterc@tcher - "Où sont les neiges d'antan?"
Back to uk.rec.sheds | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-24 03:04 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 06:38 +0000
Re: Prostate State "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 10:35 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-24 11:39 +0100
Re: Prostate State Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2023-10-24 19:03 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-26 21:38 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-26 22:21 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-27 00:24 +0100
Re: Prostate State "chrisnd@privacy.net" <chrisnd@privacy.net> - 2023-10-27 14:52 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Prostate State "chrisnd@privacy.net" <chrisnd@privacy.net> - 2023-10-27 14:51 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-27 15:01 +0100
Re: Prostate State Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2023-10-27 15:05 +0100
Re: Prostate State Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2023-10-24 19:02 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 18:09 +0000
Re: Prostate State "chrisnd@privacy.net" <chrisnd@privacy.net> - 2023-10-25 13:54 +0100
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-24 19:39 +0100
Re: Prostate State Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2023-10-25 01:34 +0100
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-25 12:07 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> - 2023-10-26 14:34 +0000
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-26 15:45 +0100
Re: Prostate State Peter <myshed@prune.org.uk> - 2023-10-26 15:27 +0000
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-26 17:09 +0100
Re: Prostate State Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2023-10-26 17:01 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> - 2023-10-26 18:32 +0000
Re: Prostate State "chrisnd @ukrm" <chrisnd@privacy.net> - 2023-10-27 14:58 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-27 15:08 +0100
Re: Prostate State Bernard Peek <bap@shrdlu.com> - 2023-10-27 20:46 +0000
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-24 08:29 +0100
Re: Prostate State Peter <myshed@prune.org.uk> - 2023-10-24 08:41 +0000
Re: Prostate State "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 10:33 +0100
Re: Prostate State Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2023-10-24 11:05 +0100
Re: Prostate State maus <maus@deb2.org> - 2023-10-24 10:55 +0000
Re: Prostate State snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-10-24 15:11 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 18:09 +0000
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-24 23:02 +0100
Re: Prostate State Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2023-10-25 12:59 -0300
Re: Prostate State "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> - 2023-10-25 17:28 +0100
Re: Prostate State Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2023-10-25 19:01 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-25 21:59 +0100
Re: Prostate State Thomas Prufer <prufer.public@mnet-online.de.invalid> - 2023-10-26 08:39 +0200
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-26 11:11 +0100
Re: Prostate State Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2023-10-26 18:54 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Nicholas D. Richards" <nicholas@salmiron.com> - 2023-10-26 22:28 +0100
Re: Prostate State Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2023-10-26 12:38 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> - 2023-10-26 09:19 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tease'n'Seize <tease-and-seize@invalid> - 2023-10-26 10:03 +0100
Re: Prostate State maus <maus@deb2.org> - 2023-10-26 14:07 +0000
Re: Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-26 21:40 +0100
Re: Prostate State Bernard Peek <bap@shrdlu.com> - 2023-10-27 20:58 +0000
Re: Prostate State Bernard Peek <bap@shrdlu.com> - 2023-10-25 17:53 +0000
Re: Prostate State Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2023-10-25 21:40 +0100
Re: Prostate State RustyHinge <rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk> - 2023-10-25 23:10 +0100
Re: Prostate State "Graham. " <graham-usenet@mail.com> - 2023-10-28 23:06 +0100
Re: Prostate State Tone <tone@email.com> - 2023-10-29 01:25 +0000
Re: Prostate State "Graham. " <graham-usenet@mail.com> - 2023-10-29 13:06 +0000
csiph-web