Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #148158

Re: The joy of simplicity?

From "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: The joy of simplicity?
Date 2015-07-10 05:35 +1000
Message-ID <d080o4F6e1qU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <5eee3647-32aa-467f-8b0c-1d6becbacfdb@googlegroups.com> <87d202qyck.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> <hg0rpa103rfffcv1sep3nag8eml0rg79i6@news.xs4all.nl> <87vbdtq2mj.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> <b976eab8-54b1-4568-91d1-0c446885aef2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw



<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
news:b976eab8-54b1-4568-91d1-0c446885aef2@googlegroups.com...
> On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 2:15:06 AM UTC-4, Mike Spencer wrote:
>
>> Yes.  That was the "arcane juju" to which I referred.  How about a
>> nice ASCII text file in which I can search for "network:dnsPrefetch"
>> instead of a tedious interactive UI with its own usage rules
>> referencing an unreadable database?  Not to mention that the entries
>> in about:config are mostly obscure in the extreme.
>
> One of the things I noticed in poking around is that set up files
> are harder to find and deal with, as you say.  Instead of ASCII
> with clear names, it's binary files with obscure names.
>
>
>
>
>> I want to disable, in a browser and at least intermittently, pretty
>> much *everything* that's been added since about the FF 3, Netscape
>> 4.76 era.  Okay, I'm an eccentric but I know there are lotsa other
>> folks who have approximately the same perspective.
>
> Unfortunately, if you disable stuff, most websites simply won't work,

That is overstated on the most.

> or even won't let you access them.  If you have an old version of
> I/E, there are sites that block you from entering.

But it is trivially easy to lie about what the browser is.

> In another situation, when one accesses the Windows Task Manager,
> there are numerous "processes" running.  The lay user can't touch
> any of them without risking serious screwup.  But some of those
> processes may be malware.  Do we really need all of those "processes"?

Obviously not but some of them are useful.

> (They also eat up CPU cycles and disk space,

They actually save both because that functionality is common
to whatever you run.

forcing one to have a
> high horsepower computer,

Tablets and smartphones prove that that is not correct.

and to replace it periodically to keep up
> with the bloat.  While computers today aren't that expensive, it's
> still some serious money ($750 to me is serious),

You don't have to spend anything like that to have something useful.

plus the inconvenience
> of transferring files, learning a new machine, etc.

You don't have to keep upgrading if you don't want to.

For hobbyists, that
> is a desired goal in itself, but for people who just want functions,
> it's a nuisance.)

> Indeed, years ago they used to compare computers against automobiles
> to show how faster computer progress was.  But I'm driving a 16 y/o
> car that runs just fine, yet a 16 y/o computer, if it even still
> physically ran ok, would simply be too slow to run anything written
> today, or today's websites.

That is just plain wrong with tablets, smartphones and netbooks
that all have cpus that are the same horse power as desktop systems
had 16 years ago and which all work fine. 

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The joy of simplicity? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-08 00:27 -0300
  Re: The joy of simplicity? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-08 09:32 -0700
    Re: The joy of simplicity? "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-10 05:28 +1000
  Re: The joy of simplicity? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-07-08 09:54 -0700
    Re: The joy of simplicity? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-07-08 17:43 +0000
    Re: The joy of simplicity? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-08 15:48 -0300
      Re: The joy of simplicity? hda <agent700@ay.invalid> - 2015-07-08 22:03 +0200
        Re: The joy of simplicity? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-09 03:14 -0300
          Re: The joy of simplicity? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-09 07:38 +0000
          Re: The joy of simplicity? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-09 17:40 +0000
          Re: The joy of simplicity? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-09 16:32 -0300
          Re: The joy of simplicity? "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-10 05:35 +1000
          Re: The joy of simplicity? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-09 16:51 -0300
          Re: The joy of simplicity? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-10 00:50 +0100
            Re: The joy of simplicity? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 00:27 +0000
              Re: The joy of simplicity? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-10 16:36 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-10 19:01 +0100
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 13:13 -0500
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 13:20 -0500
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 18:59 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-10 21:08 +0100
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-11 00:42 +0200
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-11 20:47 +0100
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-12 12:53 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 05:40 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-14 12:02 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-14 13:32 +0100
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-15 12:19 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-15 12:31 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 05:49 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-17 18:43 +0200
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 09:01 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-19 13:25 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:20 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-20 13:29 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-20 15:26 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-21 12:53 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 05:52 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 09:49 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-19 13:25 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-19 18:15 +0200
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-20 13:29 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 05:49 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:38 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-20 13:29 +0000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 05:55 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Hank" <hfd543@nospam.com> - 2015-07-12 06:00 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-11 00:38 +0200
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-07-10 15:27 -0500
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-11 00:18 -0500
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 19:22 +1000
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-10 17:53 -0700
                Re: The joy of simplicity? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-07-10 22:22 -0500
                Re: The joy of simplicity? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-10 23:39 -0700
          Re: The joy of simplicity? simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-10 08:27 +0100
    Re: The joy of simplicity? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-09 00:29 +0000
      Re: The joy of simplicity? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-09 07:38 +0000
  Re: The joy of simplicity? Daiyu Hurst <daiyu.hurst@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 12:57 -0700

csiph-web