Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56585
| From | Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: I am never going to complain about Python again |
| Date | 2013-10-10 15:51 +0000 |
| Organization | Norwich University |
| Message-ID | <bbo0omFa53vU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <52562ee3$0$2931$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <roy-582B40.09094210102013@news.panix.com> |
On 2013-10-10, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: > In article <52562ee3$0$2931$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com>, > Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote: > >> Just came across this little Javascript gem: >> >> ",,," == Array((null,'cool',false,NaN,4)); >> >> => evaluates as true >> >> http://wtfjs.com/2011/02/11/all-your-commas-are-belong-to-Array >> >> I swear, I am never going to complain about Python again. > > I've just finished reading JavaScript: The Good Parts, by Douglas > Crockford (now I'm working on the harder part of re-reading it slowly, > to make sure I really understand it). Anybody who is forced to work > with javascript should read this book. It's the K&R of JS. > > Anyway, one of the pieces of advice he gives is to pretend that == > doesn't exist, and always use ===. PHP suffers from much the same > problem. > > BTW, here's a Python equality oddity: > >>>> r = 0.0 >>>> c = 0 + 0j >>>> r == c > True >>>> int(r) == int(c) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > TypeError: can't convert complex to int > > If x == y, then f(x) should also equal f(y). More > specifically, if x == y, and x is in the domain of f(), then y > should also be in the domain of f(). Mixed arithmetic always promotes to the wider type (except in the case of complex numbers (Ha!)). r == c is equivalent to r == abs(c), which returns the magintude of the complex number. I wonder why it was deemed reasonable to do that but not for the float constructor to do the same, or even int. > BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was > when I discovered that it uses j as the imaginary unit, not i. > All right-thinking people will agree with me on this. On top of the engineering origin, j is more noticeable. -- Neil Cerutti
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-10 04:36 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 15:50 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-10-09 22:26 -0700
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-10 06:39 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-10 08:41 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-10-10 10:23 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-10-10 12:10 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-10-10 06:43 -0500
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-10-10 13:44 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-10 09:09 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 15:51 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-10-10 16:57 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-10-10 17:10 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 17:48 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 12:35 -0600
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 18:49 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 20:47 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 19:54 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-10-11 08:52 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-10 20:07 -0400
Is this the room for an argument? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-10 21:26 -0700
Re: Is this the room for an argument? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-11 09:49 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 02:23 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-11 12:31 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-10 20:09 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 02:08 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-10-11 09:17 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 09:11 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 20:52 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-10-11 17:56 +0100
csiph-web