Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56599
| From | Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: I am never going to complain about Python again |
| Date | 2013-10-10 18:49 +0000 |
| Organization | Norwich University |
| Message-ID | <bbob64F12j4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <bbo0omFa53vU1@mid.individual.net> <l36ipg$kjt$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.951.1381421409.18130.python-list@python.org> <bbo7j0Fbp3qU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.955.1381430188.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 2013-10-10, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> wrote: >> Woah. I thought I was going by what the docs say: >> >> Python fully supports mixed arithmetic: when a binary >> arithmetic operator has operands of different numeric types, >> the operand with the ?narrower? type is widened to that of the >> other, where integer is narrower than floating point, which is >> narrower than complex. Comparisons between numbers of mixed >> type use the same rule. [2] The constructors int(), float(), >> and complex() can be used to produce numbers of a specific >> type. >> >> [...] >> >> [2] Not for complex numbers. Instead convert to floats using >> abs() if appropriate. >> >> I guess the "if appropriate" part eluded my eye. When *is* it >> appropriate? Apparently not during an equal test. > > If you click on the footnote, it takes you to: > > [2]As a consequence, the list [1, 2] is considered equal to [1.0, > 2.0], and similarly for tuples. > > The text that you have mistakenly identified as the footnote is > actually part of the key to the "Notes" column of the numeric > operations table, where it is referred to by the "x % y" and > "divmod(x, y)" operations. Specifically, it warns of this error: > >>>> 3j % 2j > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > TypeError: can't mod complex numbers. Doh! Thanks, for that, and for the corrections. I could have avoided all this by testing it correctly in the REPL, too. I'll click on those footnotes instead of scanning to them from now on. -- Neil Cerutti
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-10 04:36 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 15:50 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-10-09 22:26 -0700
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-10 06:39 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-10 08:41 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-10-10 10:23 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-10-10 12:10 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-10-10 06:43 -0500
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-10-10 13:44 +0200
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-10 09:09 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 15:51 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-10-10 16:57 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-10-10 17:10 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 17:48 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 12:35 -0600
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 18:49 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 20:47 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-10 19:54 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-10-11 08:52 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-10 20:07 -0400
Is this the room for an argument? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-10 21:26 -0700
Re: Is this the room for an argument? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-11 09:49 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 02:23 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-11 12:31 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-10 20:09 -0400
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 02:08 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-10-11 09:17 +0100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 09:11 +0000
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 20:52 +1100
Re: I am never going to complain about Python again Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-10-11 17:56 +0100
csiph-web