Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2

From	joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups	comp.theory
Subject	Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2
Date	2024-07-15 08:59 +0000
Organization	i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID	<aa7643b6d8c46d2c4dd5ef92ae3650afe114adbb@i2pn2.org> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <3fc6548531f91ed14a27420caf9679a634573ed0@i2pn2.org> <v70lmo$61d8$1@dont-email.me> <8a6e6d9ff49aabe2525ce5729a439c807de4768a@i2pn2.org> <34Ocnd4voeWlDAn7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v725d7$hlvg$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:35:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/14/2024 10:02 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>> On 15/07/2024 01:20, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:00:55 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 7/14/2024 3:29 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2024 18:33:53 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 7/13/2024 6:26 PM, joes wrote:

>>>> [0000217a][0015e2dc][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call
>>>> HHH(DDD) Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation
>>>> Stopped
>>> How is this detected?
>> PO seems not to want to answer you, as I notice you've asked this
>> question more than once and PO dodges a direct response, so I'll try.
>> (Alternatively, PO has provided a link to his source code in the past,
>> so if you can find that link you can just look the answer yourself -
>> the functions are all in his halt7.c file, which is compiled but not
>> linked, then the obj file is interpreted within his x86utm.exe (source
>> also given in the link.  The link might not reflect his current code??)
Thank you. I didn't bother digging through their code, and they refused
to give the abortion criterion.

>> HHH [outer HHH only!] examines a global trace table of simulated
>> instruction (from all simulation levels merged together).  The
>> particular message "Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped"
>> seems to be issued when:
>> -  last instruction is a CALL -  working backwards through the merged
>> trace table, another CALL is encountered -  ..which is issued at the
>> same address -  ..and is calling to the same address -  ..and no
>> "conditional branch" instructions occur in the trace table
>>       between the two call instructions
>> 
>> KEY TO NOT BEING MISLED BY THE ABOVE:
>> 
>> 0. The "Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped" message is just
>> a printf.
>>     It does not prove that /actual/ infinite recursion was detected -
>>     on the contrary,
>>     all here but PO realise that the recursion detected is just
>>     finite recursion.
>> 
>> 1. The trace table being examined is NOT an x86 processor trace - it is
>> a "merged simulation trace" containing entries for ALL SIMULATION
>>     LEVELS.
>>     So the two CALL instructions are not referring to one single x86
>> processor.
> When emulated DDD calls HHH(DDD) the outer HHH emulates itself emulating
> DDD.
> I think that joes does not understand these things.

>>     Typically, the last call instruction is from a deeper nested
>>     simulation than the earlier detected call instruction.  The outer
>>     simulations are all
>>     still running, but do not appear in the trace table or logs
>> presented by PO due to the next note.
>> 
>> 2. The searched trace table is filtered to only contain instructions
>> within the C function D/DD/DDD/.. !!
>>     YES, YOU READ THAT RIGHT!  ALL CODE IN HHH IS TOTALLY IGNORED,
>> INCLUDING
>>     THE CONDITIONAL BRANCH INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE TESTING THE VERY
>>     ABORT TESTS THAT CAUSE OUTER HHH TO ABORT.
>> 
>> 3. Inner HHH's do not perform the same tests as above, because they
>> inspect a global
>>     variable which tells them they are inner HHH's.  Yeah, that means
>> the simulation
>>     is completely broken logically... [but... the outer HHH will
>>     abort first, so
>>     PO might argue the outcome will be the same, even though
>>     logically it is broken...]
Ah, and here I believed them when they said they had rewritten it.

>>  > Is it also triggered when calling a function in a loop?
>> Not sure what you mean.  Calling a function in a loop ends if the loop
>> ends, right?  What loop are you thinking of?
>> Anyhow, provided the call instructions are physically located in
>> function D() [i.e. not H() or something called from H] I guess it would
>> match.  But the C function D has only one call instruction, which isn't
>> in a loop!
I wondered about just calling the same function repeatedly with the same
parameters (on the same simulation level).

> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
> simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
It's just that the input HHH halts and does not need to be aborted.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-12 09:56 -0500
  Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-12 22:52 +0200
  Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-12 18:56 -0400
    Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-12 18:19 -0500
      Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-12 19:41 -0400
        Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-12 22:00 -0500
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-12 23:48 -0400
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 08:48 +0000
            Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 06:53 -0500
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 13:11 +0000
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 09:15 -0400
      Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-13 10:15 +0200
        Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 06:39 -0500
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-13 14:20 +0200
            Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 08:04 -0500
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 09:15 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 08:27 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 10:14 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 09:35 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 10:48 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 10:15 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 11:25 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 10:34 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 12:05 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 11:19 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 12:31 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 11:43 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 13:20 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 13:22 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 14:37 -0400
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 13:24 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 08:34 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 10:14 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 14:21 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 09:31 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 10:45 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 22:40 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 17:47 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 23:26 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 18:33 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 19:46 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-14 08:29 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-14 09:00 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-14 14:22 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 00:20 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-14 19:30 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-14 21:20 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 08:49 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 07:22 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-15 21:12 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:18 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-16 10:20 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-16 10:57 -0500
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-16 21:11 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-17 09:48 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 08:02 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-17 15:35 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 08:43 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-17 16:17 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-17 17:18 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 13:13 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-17 20:29 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 15:40 -0500
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is inCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-17 19:56 -0400
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is inCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-17 19:56 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-18 11:03 +0300
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is inCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-17 19:57 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-18 11:00 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-18 09:08 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-18 16:16 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-19 10:35 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 09:04 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-19 10:42 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-07-15 04:02 +0100
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-14 22:35 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-15 10:35 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 07:39 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 14:02 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-15 21:15 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:18 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 08:59 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 07:23 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 14:04 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 10:52 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-15 21:21 +0200
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 20:58 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 16:03 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:18 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-16 08:23 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-16 08:54 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-16 18:06 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 10:02 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-19 10:42 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 09:08 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-20 11:21 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-20 08:11 -0500
                Re: DDD INcorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-20 09:22 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-21 12:34 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-21 08:34 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-21 14:55 +0000
                Re: DDD INcorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-21 13:52 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-22 10:57 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 08:46 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-23 09:32 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 08:31 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-16 20:27 +0200
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-16 21:10 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:18 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:18 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-07-15 17:03 +0100
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 --- key point needing review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 11:23 -0500
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 --- key point needing review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:19 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 07:09 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 07:43 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:17 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-15 11:09 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 08:39 -0500
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:19 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-16 10:47 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-16 13:10 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-16 20:37 +0000
                Re: DDD INcorrectly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-16 21:10 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 19:32 -0400
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-14 11:58 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-14 09:49 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-14 14:22 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-15 11:15 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 08:41 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:17 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-16 11:05 +0300
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 09:15 -0400
            Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 08:30 -0500
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-13 10:14 -0400
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-13 13:17 +0000
  Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-13 11:20 +0300
    Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-13 06:37 -0500
  Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-14 13:09 +0300
    Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-14 09:50 -0500
      Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-14 14:22 -0400
      Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-15 11:17 +0300
        Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-15 08:43 -0500
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-15 21:09 +0200
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-15 20:49 +0000
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-15 22:17 -0400
          Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-16 10:57 +0300
            Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-16 13:18 -0500
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-16 20:32 +0200
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 joes <noreply@example.org> - 2024-07-16 20:43 +0000
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-07-17 09:01 +0200
              Re: DDD INcorrectly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-16 21:10 -0400
              Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-17 09:52 +0300
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-17 08:04 -0500
                Re: DDD incorrectly emulated by HHH is incorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-17 19:56 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-07-18 11:13 +0300

csiph-web