Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly

Newsgroups	comp.os.os2.programmer.porting
Date	2013-06-21 21:52 -0700
References	<kpimu0$qjm$1@adenine.netfront.net> <e27fb050-ad7a-4dd2-b47d-c569ef8bdcad@googlegroups.com> <kpvii4$1pkh$1@adenine.netfront.net>
Message-ID	<a0fffa87-82c6-40c6-af7f-ccdbf659739a@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly
From	gianfli.cim@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

Il giorno giovedì 20 giugno 2013 20:44:18 UTC+2, Lewis Rosenthal ha scritto:
> So, you have not checked yet whether you get the same error under 5.14
> 
> as under 5.16?
> 
> 
> 
> Just curious. I'm going to uninstall 5.16 as soon as I can get it
> 
> untangled (I really wanted to test building some rpms, and that seems to
> 
> be a dependency, but I haven't confirmed it, as yet).

No, i don't checked this, for me it was a moment, I only spent the time to install, run testperl and a few other commands like autoreconf knew that generate the error.

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.porting | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly Lewis Rosenthal <lgrosenthal@2-de-sp-am-2rosenthals.com> - 2013-06-15 17:39 -0400
  Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-06-15 20:18 -0700
    Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly Lewis Rosenthal <lgrosenthal@2-de-sp-am-2rosenthals.com> - 2013-06-20 14:11 -0400
      Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 17:15 -0700
  Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly gianfli.cim@gmail.com - 2013-06-16 00:10 -0700
    Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly Lewis Rosenthal <lgrosenthal@2-de-sp-am-2rosenthals.com> - 2013-06-20 14:44 -0400
      Re: wget 1.14 - again this dynamic vs static thing, mainly gianfli.cim@gmail.com - 2013-06-21 21:52 -0700

csiph-web