Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12471
| From | Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond |
| Date | 2022-11-08 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FpCLD-2lJF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FaYEp-aRp5-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:00:42PM +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi all,
Sorry for the late reply, this got backlogged in my inbox.
> The first point is to plan when we'll switch the default JDK to OpenJDK 17.
> The transition has progressed well, with 113 bugs fixed already, but there
> are still 36 bugs left to fix [1] (this is a much smoother transition than
> the jump from OpenJDK 8 to 11 where we had to deal with over 500 bugs).
> There are no critical issues, the build tools and the main packages all work
> fine. So I suggest that we switch without waiting for the remaining bugs to
> be fixed. I propose to switch on October 31th for Halloween, such that the
> switch will unleash compatibility nightmares and runtime horrors haunting
> those who have ignored the bug reports for months ;) That'll leave
> sufficient time to address the remaining issues before the release.
Sounds good to me!
> If the Security Team agrees I think we should continue with this strategy in
> Bookworm and ship OpenJDK 21 in addition to OpenJDK 17. The first OpenJDK 21
> EA release will be available in December well before the freeze in March, so
> that fits with the Bookworm release timeline.
That's fine with me (if doko continues to update it in unstable) (and if we
again only have 17 as the default + 21 preview/secondary JRE). And 11 not in
testing.
Cheers,
Moritz
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 12:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 14:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 20:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 20:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2022-10-12 02:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2022-11-09 12:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-10-31 19:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-10-31 20:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 21:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 01:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 01:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 12:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 20:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web