Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12482
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond |
| Date | 2022-11-11 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FqzVn-2Yb4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <Fqn7Q-2QxJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FqnAR-2QH4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FqnAR-2QH4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fqqfn-2Sin-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fqqp3-2SlE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 11/11/2022 à 01:46, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > 3. openjdk-11-jre-headless was used in bullseye (most people I know > do this to avoid the needless metapackage), the user will end up with > both because the Provides on java-runtime-headless in bullseye was > unversioned but maybe they don’t (worse if the package is backported). Not installing default-jre isn't really a good idea, because once the system is upgraded to bookworm, openjdk-11-jre will not be updated anymore and a manual update to openjdk-17-jre will be necessary at some point. That said, by the time bookworm is released openjdk-11 is likely to be updated in bullseye, and the update will provide the java-runtime (= 11) dependency. This is somewhat similar to the case 2. > It’s worse for sid users, especially for rare cases. Why worse? sid users will be the first to receive the updated openjdk package with the versioned java-runtime dependency. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 12:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 14:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 20:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 20:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2022-10-12 02:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2022-11-09 12:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-10-31 19:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-10-31 20:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 21:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 01:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 01:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 12:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 20:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web