Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12450
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond |
| Date | 2022-09-29 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Fb68V-aVPk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FaYEp-aRp5-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fb0wx-aSvk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 29/09/2022 à 14:06, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> Last point, we still have OpenJDK 8 in unstable to help with the bootstrapping >> of some packages that can't build directly with the latest JDK (more >> specifically, Kotlin and Scala). Similarly I think we should preserve OpenJDK >> 11 in unstable after the transition to OpenJDK 17. > > Who’s going to maintain that? I don't think the maintenance is a concern, we only have to ensure it keeps building in sid. It's just to compile stuff in sid, not to run critical production systems. > So I think we should keep 11 around *only* if someone (could be Doko, > could be someone else) commits to maintaining it. If nobody does, Scala > and Kotlin are SOL. I don't mind for Scala, but Kotlin can't be ignored unfortunately. Its integration into Gradle makes it an essential part of the Java ecosystem. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 12:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 14:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-09-29 20:10 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-09-29 20:40 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2022-10-12 02:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-08 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2022-11-09 12:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-10-31 19:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-10-31 20:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 21:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 01:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 01:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-11 12:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-11-11 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 22:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-11-08 20:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-11-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web