Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410668
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52146FB.A0DF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <odgn7h$r1r$1@dont-email.me> <D5213337.A0DB2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgqst$74h$1@dont-email.me> <D5214165.A0DD6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgscl$a81$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 4/22/17, 5:27 PM, in article odgscl$a81$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: ... >>>>> Where do they sell human rights? >>>> >>>> Why they? We can look at extreme examples of selling slaves. Economically >>>> that worked well and in the US we even needed a war to stop it. When it was >>>> (mostly) stopped the slaves were never compensated but the slave OWNERS >>>> were. Insanity. >>> >>> Well, since you are white, where is your economic boon from slavery? >> >> When did I say I was white? And who said all whites benefited from it? > > You didn't have to say. > I know an apologist when I see/read one. Ah, so you are just making things up to get attention. OK. >>>> And the focus on making money over human rights is largely what has lead to >>>> this: >>>> >>>> <https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing> >>> >>> SNIP opinionated theories. >> >> OK, so you have nothing to counter it with. Fair enough. > > I don't need to counter it. Correct: but if you are going to deny it you should back your denial with something. Or you can say you just disagree and offer nothing relevant. > The US has rich people of all races, religions, national origins. Like that: not relevant. Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied otherwise. >>>>> Is it in the cereal isle near the froot loops? >>>> >>>> Nope... that is where environmental disasters are. :) >>>> >>> >>> The froot loops come after them. :) >> >> Yes... they are listed alphabetically. >> > > The froot loops always follow anything environmental. > Froot loops are big into race issues too. > You would think people may be tempted to make careers out of it. I am not surprised to see you thinking in such terms. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-22 22:58 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:01 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 08:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:22 -0700
csiph-web