Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410660

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/22/17, 5:01 PM, in article odgqst$74h$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:20:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/22/17, 3:58 PM, in article odgn7h$r1r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:55:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On 4/22/17, 2:38 PM, in article op.yy381xf2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:15:01 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 11:16 AM, in article octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the
>>>>>>>>> spending
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> other people's money.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Quote?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is an entirely correct statement.
>>>>>>> Get a child to read for you in the future.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So no quote to back your claims of my views. Got it. You are just
>>>>>> trolling
>>>>>> for attention.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Keep in mind I am the one who pushes for a STRONGER tie between hard work
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> productivity and financial gain.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's called "capitalism".
>>>> 
>>>> Capitalism, without checks, is the selling of human rights and the
>>>> environment to the highest bidder and directly works AGAINST those goals.
>>>> With that said, pure Socialism would be no better. Having a mix of the two
>>>> is not perfect but works far better than either, alone.
>>> 
>>> Where do they sell human rights?
>> 
>> Why they? We can look at extreme examples of selling slaves. Economically
>> that worked well and in the US we even needed a war to stop it. When it was
>> (mostly) stopped the slaves were never compensated but the slave OWNERS
>> were. Insanity.
> 
> Well, since you are white, where is your economic boon from slavery?

When did I say I was white? And who said all whites benefited from it?

>> And the focus on making money over human rights is largely what has lead to
>> this:
>> 
>> <https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing>
> 
> SNIP opinionated theories.

OK, so you have nothing to counter it with. Fair enough.

>>> Is it in the cereal isle near the froot loops?
>> 
>> Nope... that is where environmental disasters are. :)
>> 
> 
> The froot loops come after them. :)

Yes... they are listed alphabetically.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:55 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-22 22:58 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 16:20 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:01 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:20 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:27 +0000
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:54 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:55 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 01:20 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 08:15 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:17 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:07 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 12:05 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:16 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:18 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:22 -0700

csiph-web