Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #406632

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/6/17, 8:02 AM, in article
sandman-845bd2a86298aa3a1d0b15b8f425715d@individual.net, "Sandman"
<mr@sandman.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> In article <k1ccecdkarnd6go8sgi2l2g26vrofvdeag@4ax.com>, chrisv wrote:
> 
>>>> Snit:
>>>> Look at Carroll and his "gluey" and the "he who shall not be
>>>> named" and the "the thing" and more.
>>> 
>>> Sandman:
>>> I can't "look" at anything because you provided no substantiation
>>> to look at. Only mere claims. So you have two claims that need
>>> support:
>> 
>>> "What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory
>>> nicknames"
>> 
>>> What "nicknames"?
>> 
>>> "as they do so often..."
>> 
>>> How often is that?
>> 
>> Well, you must concede that the thing is sometimes mentioned,
>> without using its name.
> 
> Of course, but it's only relevant if it can be quantified. I.e. typing the
> word "it" or "the thing" is hard to measure. So a list of nicknames and how
> to measure them is a start.
> 
>> However, if the obsessed Carroll is
>> excluded, those mentions are not very frequent, and would be quite
>> rare, if the thing would only stop trolling (or, better yet, drop
>> dead).
> 
> Yes, the claim is "often", which to me sounds like it would add at least
> another 30-40% to the numbers, right? So that needs to be measured to be
> supported. 

I gave multiple specific examples and never suggested any percentage.

You, lying, denied I provided examples.

Simple as that.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY5ligAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRd2EIAJwJ5FTPnM7hE1fNCW/OfUHQ
> e0Cx57J9PYvKnuPO1SrVHapWVafqScNBMLgz/BQwJqHF49gmhi2etU/M87n85kVd
> 4dkUaOkxuZez+GTeWhhbWejAJT9ixn9NFNOZndQVNmEcvAs5wV6jD/bSRkC5Nogo
> 99hU4P6ajNLBQkhsnUUOooYPNBjfWxkvydwCaQlm/1FRcc2MHf/32axQZtehx1f8
> NQZBPJtxkk4nIZYe/rDb6/3JJ2lD7wTbDLcWb3Ib0Vv2I80s5mw73LZ1JIVKVyCl
> RdsbBONCih5sONzXWFq+A1KWrw2paQ7vwZk1q4pADND9Zwnx2HP9KdLOG4ujZf0=
> =+2KU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-05 07:57 +0000
  Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:59 -0700
    Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-05 21:15 +0000
      Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 14:54 -0700
        Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 07:36 +0000
          Re: spreadsheet ergonomics chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 07:20 -0500
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 15:02 +0000
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:11 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 16:30 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:51 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 17:34 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 11:52 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 20:18 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 13:31 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 14:22 +0000
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:08 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:35 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 17:44 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 11:13 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 20:07 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 13:31 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 14:20 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:26 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 16:03 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-08 07:26 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-07 11:50 -0500
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-07 09:55 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:58 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-08 07:32 +0000
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:34 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-07 09:12 -0400
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:22 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-07 08:37 -0700
          Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:12 -0700

csiph-web