Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #406522

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <D50AB588.9CEF7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

> > > > > Snit:
> > > > > What about when those who troll me refer to me with
> > > > > derogatory nicknames
> > > > 
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > Those would be irrelevant to this data,
> > > 
> > > Snit:
> > > Ah, so I am right about why you often refer to me without using
> > > my name.
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > I wouldn't know since it's just a mere claim
> 
> I showed multiple examples from today.

Incorrect, you have shown no such thing.

What you snipped and ran from:

I wouldn't know since it's just a mere claim from you without substantiation
or data to determine its validity. Like always. Ands as such, the claim can
be disregarded as irrelevant regardless.

> > Sandman:
> > since it shows how often you mention their names, i.e. how
> > obsessed you are of the regulars in cola, not the other way
> > around.
>
> Ah, that explains why when I post ZERO times for a month I am still
> the most commonly mentioned person. LOL!

Another unsubstantiated claim, I see. Good for you! Your track record of
zero proof holds fast!

> Face it, your data is nonsense.

The data is data and nothing more. That you want to call it "nonsense" says
more about you than anything else.

> How about using the trolling criteria from Google I pointed you to
> and showing how all the regulars, including you and I, rate.

I am not aware of any supposed "trolling criteria from Google".

> But give how it will not back your biases you NEVER will. This is
> 100% predictable.

The data is what it is, that's how often you mention others when not
responding to them, and how many of those posts are of all your posts. And
I'm not even counting your sock puppets!

> > > Snit:
> > > as they do so often...
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Got any data to support that claim? No? Figures.
>
> Look at Carroll and his "gluey" and the "he who shall not be named"
> and the "the thing" and more.

I can't "look" at anything because you provided no substantiation to look
at. Only mere claims. So you have two claims that need support:

   "What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory
   nicknames"

What "nicknames"?

   "as they do so often..."

How often is that?

> Am I going to waste my time counting such instances just to have you
> lie... no.

I am already fully aware that you can't and won't substantiate your claims.

> Why would I waste my time like that?

Why did you waste your time making claims you can't support? No one knows,
but here we are. As you are well aware, when I make a claim I provide ample
support for that claim.

> Yeah, those of you who troll like to play with your databases of
> COLA in a bizarrely obsessive way, lie about what you find through
> twisted stats, and then whine when you are proved wrong.

Only, none of that has happened outside your mind. The data is what it is.
The metric (mentions) was provided by you when the metric I assumed
(responses) was deemed invalid by you, in spite of a response from grey
cloud was what you labeled as "obsessing".

The problem for you is that the data exists, and it can be queried and
statistics can be shown and substantiated. You can't change that, you can
only make claims using mere words in response. You have nothing to counter
the onslaught of data that is poured over you whenever you make an incorrect
claim. You're not even a guy that brought a knife to a gun fight, you
brought a balloon.

> Oh well. It is all part of the "fun" of COLA.

I agree, to see you crying on the floor whenever your claims are shot down
is indeed very entertaining.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY5e/kAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRnDkH/jXBJVd0nBvddALN72TgEpyC
QD7YYzjlXMqe6quEcLb83d3cjc/HRCp7fKj67uVqbjG1IUIfBorUe8USypNY1qgD
1TE3qapKHxchbgTEoiLDM34H1TitY54/mdoKTs8ALFTEqs5GSm7PH0IbB+TbXL1c
+nZDTFn0d8gCLjLxFvCCr/yiX5x4Q1xjc+qUt5n5/0BVUUHNS6y4uyHp1V961MV+
4JKCiy6mcZZ265TBD1YD9tAngfEJTSuV36gawYJ/c7SAKHcO7kOnnrIWq3vK974h
ofwPHDkkOPMbcnhFp9f3bmmYj0KlGnpdzJXEEE1C+zq416l2KNLf4K62hHCCPuE=
=LXhG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Sandman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-05 07:57 +0000
  Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:59 -0700
    Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-05 21:15 +0000
      Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 14:54 -0700
        Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 07:36 +0000
          Re: spreadsheet ergonomics chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 07:20 -0500
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 15:02 +0000
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:11 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 16:30 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:51 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 17:34 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 11:52 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 20:18 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 13:31 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 14:22 +0000
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:08 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:35 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 17:44 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 11:13 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-06 20:07 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 13:31 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 14:20 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:26 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-07 16:03 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-08 07:26 +0000
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-07 11:50 -0500
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-07 09:55 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:58 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-08 07:32 +0000
            Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:34 -0700
              Re: spreadsheet ergonomics DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-07 09:12 -0400
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:22 -0700
                Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-07 08:37 -0700
          Re: spreadsheet ergonomics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-06 09:12 -0700

csiph-web