Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #116938

Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it.

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/29/12 10:04 PM, in article
e49a8407-2959-46fa-874a-ab8ff3e2a453@si8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com, "Onion
Knight" <onionknightgot@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> You give fucked up lying answers to numbers 2 and 3 and ignore all the
>>> rest of the points because you are a yellow bellied fucktard.
>> 
>> I believe there's a statistical term for when a single state (out of the
>> entire WORLD) causes such a fluctuation in the usage numbers. What does that
>> make those data points again... oh yeah, it makes them outliers!
>> 
>> Since you can't seem to understand even the simplest concepts, or even show
>> basic reading comprehension, I suggest you shoot yourself in the head and
>> spare the world your brain-damaged idiocy. I can give you a link to a video
>> showing how it's done since you apparently need your hand held for absolutely
>> everything.
>> 
>> --
>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/LinearTrendLineCreation.mov> - Snit's
>> ignorance of Excel and his hilarious attempt at statistical analysis
> 
> Snit has shown his work and shared his Excel documents. He could not
> replicate your claims. Nor could the people in other forums who
> clearly know more than you.
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.stat.spss/msg/4de96ad94edf6570
> 
> Why not show your work? Show how you found outliers in ways nobody
> else could replicate.

cc claims of what he found as outliers are not matching what *anyone* else
can replicate (well, Carroll claimed to but also failed to show his work).

I have shown my work in quite some detail and even shared my Excel
spreadsheets I used so they could be examined by others.

There is no doubt cc will *never* do this, even though I have offered to
post them if he emails them to me.  He can lock them or do whatever else he
wants to make sure I do not modify them.  Or he can post them elsewhere...
but the bottom line is he will *never* post them.

He made up his claims.  He lied.

-- 
Summary of cc's statistical BS: <http://tinyurl.com/7rwazxw>
Details on cc's "outliers" BS: <http://tinyurl.com/84r3ypq>
More on cc's ignorance about outliers: <http://tinyurl.com/7vyhttc>
On cc's claims about Grubbs and Quartiles: <http://tinyurl.com/75yvo8z>
Details on cc's sigma and R^2 BS: <http://tinyurl.com/7vambev>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-27 22:05 -0700
  Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-28 05:41 -0700
    Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-28 09:01 -0700
    Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 22:04 -0700
      Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-30 11:03 -0700
        Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 21:23 -0700
          Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-30 23:11 -0700

csiph-web