Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #117018

Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it.

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/30/12 9:23 PM, in article
53b1be14-93c0-4a2a-99b6-e065e83a1bcc@2g2000pbv.googlegroups.com, "Onion
Knight" <onionknightgot@gmail.com> wrote:

...
>>> Snit has shown his work and shared his Excel documents. He could not
>>> replicate your claims. Nor could the people in other forums who clearly know
>>> more than you. 
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.stat.spss/msg/4de96ad94...
>>> 
>>> Why not show your work? Show how you found outliers in ways nobody else
>>> could replicate.
>>> 
>> cc claims of what he found as outliers are not matching what *anyone* else
>> can replicate (well, Carroll claimed to but also failed to show his work).
> 
> They are desperately trying to find any method to show the results
> they made up. Best of luck to the assholes. Or maybe they will have
> socks jumps in and insist they found the same results but also refuse
> to show how. You are the only one who actually shows what you have
> found and how. CC and Steve are never going to do that.

I suspect we will see several "new" people all claiming that they replicated
what cc said... but none will show their work.  Carroll and cc will point to
these socks and claim that since so many people agreed with them no work
needs to be shown.  It is a game Carroll has repeatedly played.

>> I have shown my work in quite some detail and even shared my Excel
>> spreadsheets I used so they could be examined by others.
>> 
>> There is no doubt cc will *never* do this, even though I have offered to
>> post them if he emails them to me.  He can lock them or do whatever else he
>> wants to make sure I do not modify them.  Or he can post them elsewhere...
>> but the bottom line is he will *never* post them.
> 
> There is no doubt you are correct. None.

Of course not: they have no faith in their claims - they know they are
liars.  

>> He made up his claims.  He lied.

-- 
Summary of cc's statistical BS: <http://tinyurl.com/7rwazxw>
Details on cc's "outliers" BS: <http://tinyurl.com/84r3ypq>
More on cc's ignorance about outliers: <http://tinyurl.com/7vyhttc>
Four method compared to cc's absurd claims: <http://tinyurl.com/7efkuzm>
Details on cc's sigma and R^2 BS: <http://tinyurl.com/7vambev>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-28 05:41 -0700
  Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-28 09:01 -0700
  Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 22:04 -0700
    Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-30 11:03 -0700
      Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 21:23 -0700
        Re: cc is proved wrong about "outliers"... but he will never admit to it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-30 23:11 -0700

csiph-web