Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #115628

Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy
Date	2012-06-21 15:33 -0700
Message-ID	<CC08EF5F.3CA1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <jrst9i$cm6$1@dont-email.me> <jrt0b7$1al$1@dont-email.me> <6v14u79noddaq2v29bvee5et6siqf4dcq5@4ax.com> <3c4819a1-98b2-4fcf-b997-a6cc548d19ee@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <js01mh$dhj$3@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/21/12 1:54 PM, in article js01mh$dhj$3@dont-email.me, "DFS"
<nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

> On 6/21/2012 12:47 PM, White Spirit wrote:
>> On Jun 20, 6:28 pm, chrisv<chr...@nospam.invalid>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Not one of the trolls will step out of line to denounce even such
>>> *obvious* dishonesty, will they?
>> 
>> Perhaps one of us should use an anonymous sock puppet to set him
>> straight ;)
> 
> 
> As Snit has shown, you use a sock puppet to agree with yourself first.
> 
> You could call yours Carrot Barron as an homage to Onion Knight...

You are aping Carroll's accusations.  This is a new low for you.

But I will bite:

1) What is your best evidence Carroll is not just spewing his normal lies
with his accusations about Onion Knight and Kaba.

2) And can you get Carroll to list the names he has used on Usenet.

Of course not.  You will run from both questions.  While you something say
things of value, you often just make things up or spew idiotic things you
know are not true.

-- 
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P>
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP>
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu>
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 10:45 -0400
  Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-20 18:20 +0200
    Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 12:24 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-20 18:32 +0200
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 12:40 -0400
    Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-20 13:14 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 12:28 -0500
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 13:34 -0400
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 09:47 -0700
          Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-21 16:54 -0400
            Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:33 -0700
              Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2012-06-21 23:51 +0100
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:56 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 01:20 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 11:16 +0200
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-22 11:41 +0200
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 03:01 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-22 07:32 -0400
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-22 08:00 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-23 08:31 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-22 07:50 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-22 19:25 -0400
            Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2012-06-21 23:48 +0100
              Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-21 19:01 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 13:32 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy chrisv <remailer@reece.net.au> - 2012-06-20 18:10 +0000
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 09:46 -0700
  Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2012-06-20 22:51 +0200

csiph-web