Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #115634

Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy
Date	2012-06-21 15:56 -0700
Message-ID	<CC08F4B7.3CAB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <6v14u79noddaq2v29bvee5et6siqf4dcq5@4ax.com> <3c4819a1-98b2-4fcf-b997-a6cc548d19ee@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <js01mh$dhj$3@dont-email.me> <CC08EF5F.3CA1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <js08gk$ib7$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/21/12 3:51 PM, in article js08gk$ib7$2@dont-email.me, "White Spirit"
<wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:

> On 21/06/12 23:33, Snit wrote:
> 
>> On 6/21/12 1:54 PM, in article js01mh$dhj$3@dont-email.me, "DFS"
>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> 
>>> As Snit has shown, you use a sock puppet to agree with yourself first.
> 
>>> You could call yours Carrot Barron as an homage to Onion Knight...
> 
>> You are aping Carroll's accusations.  This is a new low for you.
> 
> I thought Onion Knight had a certain relevance - you are a bit of a
> vegetable.

For anyone who knows of the Song of Ice and Fire the reference is obvious.
Now why that character... you would have to ask Onion Knight.

While Carroll spewed the lie about he and I being the same person and
several others have copied that accusation, notice there is not a shred of
evidence to back Carroll's BS lies... and his lies came right after he was
asked to list his names he has used.  I will grant - he is a very good
troll... obfuscating the real issue as he attacks me.  But he has had a
*lot* of experience... he has been harassing me since 2004, ever since some
woman dumped him and he idiotically blamed me.

>> But I will bite:
> 
> I think you've bitten off a bit more onion than you can chew.

The questions were about the best evidence to support Carroll's BS about
Onion Knight and to see if anyone can get him to list the online names he
has used.

But you have no evidence... and know Carroll is lying.

-- 
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P>
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP>
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu>
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 10:45 -0400
  Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-20 18:20 +0200
    Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 12:24 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-20 18:32 +0200
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 12:40 -0400
    Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-20 13:14 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 12:28 -0500
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 13:34 -0400
        Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 09:47 -0700
          Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-21 16:54 -0400
            Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:33 -0700
              Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2012-06-21 23:51 +0100
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:56 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 01:20 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 11:16 +0200
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-22 11:41 +0200
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 03:01 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-22 07:32 -0400
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-22 08:00 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-23 08:31 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-22 07:50 -0700
                Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-22 19:25 -0400
            Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2012-06-21 23:48 +0100
              Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-21 19:01 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-20 13:32 -0400
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy chrisv <remailer@reece.net.au> - 2012-06-20 18:10 +0000
      Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 09:46 -0700
  Re: 'Linux is perfect' and 'Linux is perfect for' idiocy "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2012-06-20 22:51 +0200

csiph-web