Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #115172

Re: How many hundreds of posts...

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/19/12 5:29 AM, in article
c68e1b21-2a19-4c78-bc0c-e8899cb54ae3@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com, "White
Spirit" <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 18, 10:38 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> ... will cc and Carroll spew at each other as they deny the facts?
> 
> When will you get some treatment for your mental problems?  If you
> weren't so pathetic and laughable, it would be insulting that you
> think people are so stupid that they would believe your Onion Knight
> in shining armour is anything other than a sock puppet.

Carroll made up this claim to run from the facts:

1) cc was wrong to say I missed steps in the creation of a linear trend line
in Excel.  I did no such thing.

2) cc was wrong to claim the incorrect depictions I showed him of sigma
lines were, in fact, incorrect.  But they were.

3) cc was wrong to say I was pushing the correlations I noted as being proof
of the causation I had spoken of earlier.  I did no such thing.

4) cc was wrong to deny the fact that on a depiction of a normal
distribution you can visually see where the sigma lines should be drawn
based on the distance from the mean (specifically, the distance from the
mean to the inflection points).

5) cc was wrong to deny I showed an upward trend in Linux usage, based on
the data we were both using.  The upward trend was in the latter half of
2011: <http://goo.gl/NhFuK>.

There is no reasoned debate about any of these facts.

He also started making this accusation once it was noted he uses so many
names he cannot name them all.  And he cannot.  Ask him... he just runs.
Every time.

> I actually pity you.  It requires a state of severe, wretched
> desperation to go to the lengths you did trying to make yourself look
> good in front of a group of people on a newsgroup who overwhelmingly
> hold you in contempt.  Your life must be incredibly empty that you go
> to such bizarre lengths to seek validation from complete strangers,
> not to mention your conspicuous lack of self-esteem.

What the heck are you talking about?  I know your herd will never like
truth... any more than Carroll or cc will.  I remain honest because that is
who and what I am... not to gain your favor.

> I hope for your sake that you have hit rock bottom because I would not
> wish any further descent into ignominy upon my worst enemy.

I hope you learn to make a point with your BS some day.  That would be cool!

-- 
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P>
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP>
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu>
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 14:38 -0700
  Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 04:59 +0000
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-19 10:23 +0100
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:17 +0100
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:07 -0700
      Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:57 +0000
        Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 12:18 -0700
  Re: How many hundreds of posts... White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 05:29 -0700
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:03 -0700
      Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 11:25 -0700
        Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 16:40 -0400
          Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-19 15:54 -0500
          Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 14:01 -0700
            Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 20:50 -0400
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 17:57 -0700
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-20 10:01 +0100
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 06:33 -0500
            Re: How many hundreds of posts... Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:28 -0700
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 11:59 +0100

csiph-web