Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #114990

How many hundreds of posts...

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject How many hundreds of posts...
Date 2012-06-18 14:38 -0700
Message-ID <CC04EDD2.38B3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


... will cc and Carroll spew at each other as they deny the facts?

1) cc was wrong to say I missed steps in the creation of a linear trend line
in Excel.  I did no such thing.

2) cc was wrong to claim the incorrect depictions I showed him of sigma
lines were, in fact, incorrect.  But they were.

3) cc was wrong to say I was pushing the correlations I noted as being proof
of the causation I had spoken of earlier.  I did no such thing.

4) cc was wrong to deny the fact that on a depiction of a normal
distribution you can visually see where the sigma lines should be drawn
based on the distance from the mean (specifically, the distance from the
mean to the inflection points).

5) cc was wrong to deny I showed an upward trend in Linux usage, based on
the data we were both using.  The upward trend was in the latter half of
2011: <http://goo.gl/NhFuK>.

There is no reasoned debate about any of these facts.


-- 
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P>
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP>
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu>
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 14:38 -0700
  Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 04:59 +0000
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-19 10:23 +0100
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:17 +0100
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:07 -0700
      Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:57 +0000
        Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 12:18 -0700
  Re: How many hundreds of posts... White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 05:29 -0700
    Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:03 -0700
      Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 11:25 -0700
        Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 16:40 -0400
          Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-19 15:54 -0500
          Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 14:01 -0700
            Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 20:50 -0400
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 17:57 -0700
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-20 10:01 +0100
              Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 06:33 -0500
            Re: How many hundreds of posts... Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:28 -0700

csiph-web