Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #114990
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | How many hundreds of posts... |
| Date | 2012-06-18 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CC04EDD2.38B3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
... will cc and Carroll spew at each other as they deny the facts? 1) cc was wrong to say I missed steps in the creation of a linear trend line in Excel. I did no such thing. 2) cc was wrong to claim the incorrect depictions I showed him of sigma lines were, in fact, incorrect. But they were. 3) cc was wrong to say I was pushing the correlations I noted as being proof of the causation I had spoken of earlier. I did no such thing. 4) cc was wrong to deny the fact that on a depiction of a normal distribution you can visually see where the sigma lines should be drawn based on the distance from the mean (specifically, the distance from the mean to the inflection points). 5) cc was wrong to deny I showed an upward trend in Linux usage, based on the data we were both using. The upward trend was in the latter half of 2011: <http://goo.gl/NhFuK>. There is no reasoned debate about any of these facts. -- The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P> cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP> 7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu> cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 14:38 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 04:59 +0000
Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-19 10:23 +0100
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:17 +0100
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:07 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:57 +0000
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 12:18 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... White Spirit <wulfgar1976@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 05:29 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 08:03 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 11:25 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 16:40 -0400
Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-19 15:54 -0500
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 14:01 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-19 20:50 -0400
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-19 17:57 -0700
Re: How many hundreds of posts... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2012-06-20 10:01 +0100
Re: How many hundreds of posts... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 06:33 -0500
Re: How many hundreds of posts... Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 18:28 -0700
csiph-web