Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8872

Re: preprocessor idea

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/14/2011 04:49 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 12:35 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> On 12.10.2011 01:17, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

>>> Run the Java code through the C preprocessor with the same defines.
>>>
>>> String[] javaarray = {
>>> "None"
>>> #ifdef lib1
>>> ,"lib1"
>>> #endif
>>> #ifdef lib1
>>> ,"lib1"
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>
>> I do not think it's worthwhile to open that can of worms for this
>> decision. After all getting rid of the CPP is one of the major
>> advantages of Java over C++ (even Stroustrup regrets not having ripped
>> it out of C++) and complicating the Java build process just for that
>> decision seems too heavy - especially since there are other solutions
>> available.
>
> What other solution achieve the same?

Please see elsewhere in this thread.

Kind regards

	robert

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

preprocessor idea Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> - 2011-10-11 20:19 +0200
  Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-11 21:57 +0200
    Re: preprocessor idea markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-11 13:14 -0700
  Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-11 19:17 -0400
    Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-13 18:35 +0200
      Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-13 22:49 -0400
        Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-16 23:56 +0200
          Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-16 22:32 -0400
            Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-17 18:53 +0200
  Re: preprocessor idea Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-12 07:04 -0700

csiph-web