Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8872

Re: preprocessor idea

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: preprocessor idea
Date	Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:56:14 +0200
Lines	32
Message-ID	<9g127uF848U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<j721b6$dam$1@online.de> <4e94ce75$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <9foia2FjbkU1@mid.individual.net> <4e97a33b$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Trace	individual.net 6d+tKZF8HHzTFjUMNHjfOw3U7UKK4qRvRMhlPlmtssY9kfZIM=
Cancel-Lock	sha1:Hp87LTLtX6trAIHuiIKpo7wmE4s=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15
In-Reply-To	<4e97a33b$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8872

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/14/2011 04:49 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 12:35 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> On 12.10.2011 01:17, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

>>> Run the Java code through the C preprocessor with the same defines.
>>>
>>> String[] javaarray = {
>>> "None"
>>> #ifdef lib1
>>> ,"lib1"
>>> #endif
>>> #ifdef lib1
>>> ,"lib1"
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>
>> I do not think it's worthwhile to open that can of worms for this
>> decision. After all getting rid of the CPP is one of the major
>> advantages of Java over C++ (even Stroustrup regrets not having ripped
>> it out of C++) and complicating the Java build process just for that
>> decision seems too heavy - especially since there are other solutions
>> available.
>
> What other solution achieve the same?

Please see elsewhere in this thread.

Kind regards

	robert

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

preprocessor idea Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> - 2011-10-11 20:19 +0200
  Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-11 21:57 +0200
    Re: preprocessor idea markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-11 13:14 -0700
  Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-11 19:17 -0400
    Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-13 18:35 +0200
      Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-13 22:49 -0400
        Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-16 23:56 +0200
          Re: preprocessor idea Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-16 22:32 -0400
            Re: preprocessor idea Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-17 18:53 +0200
  Re: preprocessor idea Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-12 07:04 -0700

csiph-web