Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #33264

Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile

From	bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date	2011-06-16 09:29 +0100
Message-ID	<95tt6iF17qU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <90f99c53-1aeb-4aa9-9965-894d6fd0715d@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <95q1qjFcmrU2@mid.individual.net> <d28e6811-b6c1-45bb-832c-74598423f75f@v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <95stc8Fi0oU1@mid.individual.net> <4fb683a0-ae1c-4c99-a478-ac7c00fa3bae@25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday 16 June 2011 08:17 RayLopez99 wrote:

> On Jun 16, 2:26 am, bbgruff <bbgr...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Now, are you going to answer my questions, or don't you know the answer?
>>
> 
> You answer to me boy, not the other way around.  Now go crawl back to
> your cubicle before I fire your ass and put you back on the dole.

I see.
So you were absolutely ignorant about ARM when you made your comments, 
you've since then googled a bit, and now you see how ill-advised your post 
was.
You really don't need to bluster like this Ray.  A simple "I don't know" 
would have sufficed.

Thread

Why Intel will fail in mobile Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> - 2011-06-14 16:17 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 -0700
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:34 -0700
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:46 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 22:23 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 22:24 +0000
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:01 -0700
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:07 -0700
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 00:26 +0100
            Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:17 -0700
              Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 09:29 +0100
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:54 -0500
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:39 +0100
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 23:16 +0100
        Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-15 21:32 +0200
          Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-15 22:52 +0000
            Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-17 16:12 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will (NOT) fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:55 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:35 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 14:53 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-06-14 19:54 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 17:14 -0400
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-15 17:11 +0200
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 21:45 +0200
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 15:48 -0400
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500

csiph-web