Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #33231

Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday 16 June 2011 00:07 RayLopez99 wrote:

> On Jun 15, 12:23 am, bbgruff <bbgr...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> New?
>> Just how "new" do you think ARM is, Ray?
>>
>> - and just for a laugh, how many ARM chips do you think are manufactured
>> per annum, compared with Intel?  i.e. what do you think ARMs market share
>> is, by vulume?
> 
> You misspelled "volume" Bozo.  And I'm not talking embedded devices
> fool, but netbooks.
> 
> Go home like your other pal in this thread and yank on you 'puter.
> 
> BTW, I threw out my Linux Pentium Two today, bought in 1996 or 1997,
> in the trash, after busting with a sledgehammer the Seagate 2 GB (yes
> two!) HDs and the 48 MB RAM.  I found out how the RAM was configured,
> after all these years:  four sticks--I kid you not--of 16x2 and two
> sticks of 8x2 = 32 + 16 = 48 MB.   LOL.
> 
> And it ran fine Windows 2000.  But it had a hard time running Linux
> (among other things the CD-ROM was hard to mount).

All very interesting, Ray - especially the configuration of the computer 
that the "self-made millionaire" was using at the time (a few months ago) 
that he was asking advice about:-
 - Whether he should use WD40 rather than buy a new CPU fan!
 - Whether WD40 would keep his case fan going, rather than replace it!
 - Preferred, instead of that huge outlay, to leave the side
    off his computer, and point a domestic fan at the innards!

Now, are you going to answer my questions, or don't you know the answer?

1.  How long do you think ARM has been around?
2.  How many processor chips are ARM compared with Intel?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Intel will fail in mobile Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> - 2011-06-14 16:17 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 -0700
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:34 -0700
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:46 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 22:23 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 22:24 +0000
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:01 -0700
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:07 -0700
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 00:26 +0100
            Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:17 -0700
              Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 09:29 +0100
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:54 -0500
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:39 +0100
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 23:16 +0100
        Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-15 21:32 +0200
          Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-15 22:52 +0000
            Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-17 16:12 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will (NOT) fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:55 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:35 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 14:53 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-06-14 19:54 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 17:14 -0400
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-15 17:11 +0200
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 21:45 +0200
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 15:48 -0400
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500

csiph-web