Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #227
| From | Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? |
| Date | 2011-04-10 19:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <90e7s7F9faU1@mid.dfncis.de> (permalink) |
| References | <9088euFi3iU1@mid.individual.net> <908n9pF2jaU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 08.04.2011 17:18, Ingo Thies wrote: > Another point seems to be even more problematic, that is the usage of > the "asymptotic standard error". That's actually not another point, it's exactly the same. > Gnuplot finds: > > Final set of parameters Asymptotic Standard Error > ======================= ========================== > > a = 0.948209 +/- 0.04083 (4.306%) > b = 0.427096 +/- 0.01746 (4.089%) > > > correlation matrix of the fit parameters: > > a b > a 1.000 > b -0.855 1.000 > > > while an independent approach finds > > a = 9.482095E-01 -/+-1.947044E-01, 1.947043E-01 > b = 4.270960E-01 -/+-8.327496E-02, 8.327495E-02 Those errors are _way_ too big. Do yourself a favour and plot your data along with the model, using parameters modified by those errors: [assuming 'set fit errorvar' active, and fit done:] gnuplot> p 'fit.dat' u 1:2:3 w err, a*x+b w l gnuplot> rep (a+a_err)*x+b+b_err, (a-a_err)*x+b-b_err gnuplot> a_thies=0.195 gnuplot> b_thies=.083 gnuplot> rep (a+a_thies)*x+b+b_thies, (a-a_thies)*x+b-b_thies You'll see that gnuplot's a_err and b_err yield a corridor somewhat tightly containing almost all data points and their errors, just like it should be. Your independent approach defines a corridor that is way larger than it needs to be. Particularly the error on 'a' leads to a massive overestimation of the data errors at large 'x'. E.g. at x==4, the model with those parameter errors yields an interval of 2.6 +/- 0.8, while your data claimed 2.6 +/- 0.1
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-08 13:05 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-08 17:18 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-10 19:31 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Charles Allen <ca137tmp@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-10 20:14 -0500
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-14 15:41 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-11 21:42 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-11 23:27 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-12 11:28 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-16 00:03 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-16 18:06 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-14 15:07 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-15 13:47 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-10 19:04 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-11 22:13 +0200
csiph-web