Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #256
| From | Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? |
| Date | 2011-04-14 15:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <90o9s9F5aiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <9088euFi3iU1@mid.individual.net> <908n9pF2jaU1@mid.individual.net> <90e7s7F9faU1@mid.dfncis.de> |
On 10.04.2011 19:31, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> gnuplot> p 'fit.dat' u 1:2:3 w err, a*x+b w l
> gnuplot> rep (a+a_err)*x+b+b_err, (a-a_err)*x+b-b_err
> gnuplot> a_thies=0.195
> gnuplot> b_thies=.083
> gnuplot> rep (a+a_thies)*x+b+b_thies, (a-a_thies)*x+b-b_thies
I have modified the model function to minimize the correlation of a and
b. This has been done by substituting x by x-x0, where x0 is the mean of
all x (2 in this case). Here is the full script, to be applied to the
same data table ('fit.tab'). To enhance visibility, I have given
different colors for the different error types (blue for gnuplot's, red
for mine). Please look again at the errors. Are they still _way_ too
large? Or aren't gnuplot's errors now _way_ too small?
set fit errorvar
#x0=0.; a_thies=0.195; b_thies=0.083 # old fit
x0=2.; a_thies=0.101; b_thies=0.083 # new fit
f(x)=a+b*(x-x0)
set xrange [0:4]
set yrange [0.5:3]
fit [0:4] f(x) xfile u 1:2:3 via a,b
set key left
p a+b*(x-x0) w l lc rgb '#0000ff',\
a-a_err+(b-b_err)*(x-x0) lc rgb '#007fff',\
a+a_err+(b+b_err)*(x-x0) lc rgb '#007fff',\
a-a_thies+(b-b_thies)*(x-x0) lc rgb '#ff0000',\
a+a_thies+(b+b_thies)*(x-x0) lc rgb '#ff0000',\
'fit.dat' u 1:2:3 w err lc rgb '#000000'
I would find it highly confusing if the error corridors depend on a
simple substitution. If one plotts the a,b error contours, and uses them
for the error estimate (i.e. walks around the 1-sigma contour in the a-b
space and creates the enveloping curve for all possible resulting
functions), then the "way-too-large" error for the slope b remains
constant. Only the error for the offset a changes, as expected.
--
Gruß,
Ingo
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-08 13:05 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-08 17:18 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-10 19:31 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Charles Allen <ca137tmp@earthlink.net> - 2011-04-10 20:14 -0500
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-14 15:41 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-11 21:42 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-11 23:27 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-12 11:28 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-16 00:03 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-16 18:06 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-14 15:07 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-15 13:47 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2011-04-10 19:04 +0200
Re: Fitting: How does gnuplot calculate the covariance matrix? Ingo Thies <ingo.thies@gmx.de> - 2011-04-11 22:13 +0200
csiph-web