Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #71654
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Resiliency of communication channels |
| Date | 2025-08-19 13:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <8a5enlxvfo.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <107kfi2$d4vh$21@dont-email.me> <107md3h$tn2j$5@dont-email.me> <107n07f$11pib$1@dont-email.me> <mg8fajFs3beU5@mid.individual.net> <mg9jilF3am6U11@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025-08-15 22:28, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:09:23 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> Some UPS claim that the batteries last 4 years, but in my experience >> they last 2. There is the possibility that brand name batteries are >> actually better and last 4 years. >> >> Many UPS don't say the status of the battery, you have to actually test >> them manually with a stop watch. They may have a display, but that one >> may be difficult to see when the UPS is out of sight. Only some UPS can >> be connected to a computer for monitoring. > > I've had good luck with APC. I haven't set it up but it does have a USB > connection for monitoring. Their PowerChute software specifies RHEL or > SUSE now instead of only Windows but I assume there is a general Linux > solution. > > One thing we found at work where the larger sample size meant more > instances of bad batteries is a box plugged into the wall will survive a > brief flicker; one plugged into a UPS with a bad battery goes down hard. I'm happy with Eaton. I have one (managed) powering this desktop (has 2*12 batteries), and I bought another (not managed) for my router, just one 12v battery. I think it beeps when battery is bad, we'll see. The new one at the router is not managed, but I don't have a permanent computer there to manage it, anyway. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Resiliency of communication channels (was: Re: Real-time OSs (Re: Microsoft Is Abandoning Windows 11 SE)) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 10:55 +0100
Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-15 12:09 +0200
Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 14:08 +0100
Re: Resiliency of communication channels rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 20:28 +0000
Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-15 23:20 +0200
Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-19 13:55 +0200
Re: Resiliency of communication channels Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-08-19 09:51 -0700
Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-19 21:12 +0200
Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 14:06 +0100
Re: Resiliency of communication channels Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-15 18:26 +0000
Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 19:54 +0100
csiph-web