Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #71654

Re: Resiliency of communication channels

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject Re: Resiliency of communication channels
Date 2025-08-19 13:55 +0200
Message-ID <8a5enlxvfo.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References (19 earlier) <107kfi2$d4vh$21@dont-email.me> <107md3h$tn2j$5@dont-email.me> <107n07f$11pib$1@dont-email.me> <mg8fajFs3beU5@mid.individual.net> <mg9jilF3am6U11@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-08-15 22:28, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:09:23 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> 
>> Some UPS claim that the batteries last 4 years, but in my experience
>> they last 2. There is the possibility that brand name batteries are
>> actually better and last 4 years.
>>
>> Many UPS don't say the status of the battery, you have to actually test
>> them manually with a stop watch. They may have a display, but that one
>> may be difficult to see when the UPS is out of sight. Only some UPS can
>> be connected to a computer for monitoring.
> 
> I've had good luck with APC. I haven't set it up but it does have a USB
> connection for monitoring. Their PowerChute software specifies RHEL or
> SUSE now instead of only Windows but I assume there is a general Linux
> solution.
> 
> One thing we found at work where the larger sample size meant more
> instances of bad batteries is a box plugged into the wall will survive a
> brief flicker; one plugged into a UPS with a bad battery goes down hard.

I'm happy with Eaton. I have one (managed) powering this desktop (has 
2*12 batteries), and I bought another (not managed) for my router, just 
one 12v battery. I think it beeps when battery is bad, we'll see.

The new one at the router is not managed, but I don't have a permanent 
computer there to manage it, anyway.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Resiliency of communication channels (was: Re: Real-time OSs (Re: Microsoft Is Abandoning Windows 11 SE)) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 10:55 +0100
  Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-15 12:09 +0200
    Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 14:08 +0100
    Re: Resiliency of communication channels rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-15 20:28 +0000
      Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-15 23:20 +0200
      Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-19 13:55 +0200
        Re: Resiliency of communication channels Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-08-19 09:51 -0700
          Re: Resiliency of communication channels "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-19 21:12 +0200
  Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 14:06 +0100
    Re: Resiliency of communication channels Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-15 18:26 +0000
      Re: Resiliency of communication channels The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-15 19:54 +0100

csiph-web