Re: do { quit; } else { }

From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date	2025-05-08 14:24 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<87r00yeqyo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References	<vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me> <vvep5b$m3os$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86jz6r1cf5.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> writes:
> [...]
>
>> I think Thiago's idea is brilliant.  He should become a
>> member of the  standardization committee.  He's welcome
>> to post suggestions like this here.
>
> If someone wants to propose a revision or addition to the
> ISO C standard, the appropriate newsgroup in which to post
> it is comp.std.c, not comp.lang.c.

Perhaps, but comp.std.c has no official status with the ISO C
committee.  I don't know if any of its members even read it.

Personally, I'm no longer picky about the division between
comp.lang.c and comp.std.c.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: do { quit; } else { } Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2025-05-07 06:56 +0200
  Re: do { quit; } else { } Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-07 06:52 +0100
    Re: do { quit; } else { } Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> - 2025-05-07 15:46 +0200
  Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-08 06:04 -0700
    Re: do { quit; } else { } Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-08 14:24 -0700
    Re: do { quit; } else { } Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-05-09 11:09 +0200

csiph-web