Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 14:24:15 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <87r00yeqyo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me> <vvep5b$m3os$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86jz6r1cf5.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 23:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ef4b2b5ec94e94b8636022ae34fa37c"; logging-data="2264471"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MdgRGs6WZz73UQ7f901wW"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JFM0SyOnvGehOA095bm1rGzKBm4= sha1:TCnwi19G84iXHRt987HFX5MQyRs=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393264

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> Wuns Haerst <Wuns.Haerst@wurstfabrik.at> writes:
> [...]
>
>> I think Thiago's idea is brilliant.  He should become a
>> member of the  standardization committee.  He's welcome
>> to post suggestions like this here.
>
> If someone wants to propose a revision or addition to the
> ISO C standard, the appropriate newsgroup in which to post
> it is comp.std.c, not comp.lang.c.

Perhaps, but comp.std.c has no official status with the ISO C
committee.  I don't know if any of its members even read it.

Personally, I'm no longer picky about the division between
comp.lang.c and comp.std.c.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */