Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #383560

Re: Word For Today: “Uglification”

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Word For Today: “Uglification”
Date 2024-03-12 15:21 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <87h6hb851o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References <uso6or$3t3jn$3@dont-email.me> <usopec$4eob$1@dont-email.me> <usort1$4t2r$1@dont-email.me> <usptlp$c79g$1@dont-email.me> <usqhjg$gpvk$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:51:21 -0400, James Kuyper wrote:
>> ... everything it says about one is about
>> the implementation as a whole, not the individual parts.
>
> You don’t see the problem with trying avoid clashes between those parts?

I think everyone is aware of the problem.  Was that your point?

The standard reserves certain identifiers for use by the implementation.
The implementation includes the standard library described in section 7,
not to all the libraries that happen to be installed on a system; those
libraries, as far as the standard is concerned, are just user code.
Third-party libraries are, for example, not permitted to define
identifiers starting with two underscores, because those same
identifiers might be used by the standard library or by the compiler.
This is typically not enforced, but using such an identifier in code
that's not part of the standard library has undefined behavior.  (I've
seen plenty of such identifiers in third-party code; it typically
doesn't cause a problem in practice unless there's an actual collision.)

If your point is that "name collisions are a problem", of course that's
true.  Name collisions within the standard library are typically not a
problem.  The standard library is typically provided either by a single
implementer or by a few implementers who are very careful to avoid
collisions.

C doesn't provide a namespace facility like C++'s, so implementers of
third-party libraries might use identifier prefixes or other tricks to
avoid collisions.

Again, have you actually seen name collision problems in the real world?

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 00:14 +0000
  Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 18:15 -0700
    Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 01:34 +0000
      Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 19:56 -0700
  Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-12 03:30 +0000
    Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-03-14 10:23 -0700
      Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 14:31 -0700
        Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-14 23:59 +0000
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-15 00:01 +0000
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 17:11 -0700
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-15 00:33 +0000
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-15 09:15 +0100
        Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 17:15 -0700
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-15 00:34 +0000
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 19:19 -0700
              Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-15 03:17 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 20:44 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-15 09:22 +0100
        Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-03-14 19:49 -0700
  Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-03-12 01:33 -0400
    Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 06:14 +0000
      Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 06:21 +0000
      Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-12 07:44 +0000
        Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-12 08:03 +0000
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-12 11:10 +0100
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-03-12 17:46 +0300
              Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-12 14:53 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-03-12 18:09 +0300
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-12 15:42 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-12 18:50 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-12 22:29 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 16:00 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-13 11:45 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-03-13 14:12 +0200
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 08:15 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-13 18:47 +0100
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 11:56 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-13 22:07 +0100
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-13 16:40 +0100
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-13 15:48 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 09:03 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-13 16:44 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2024-03-13 17:01 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-13 02:53 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-12 18:42 +0000
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-12 22:07 +0000
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 23:13 +0000
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 16:29 -0700
              Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-13 09:01 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 08:06 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-13 21:51 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-13 22:16 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 15:26 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-13 22:33 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-13 22:50 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 16:06 -0700
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-13 23:32 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-14 00:40 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-13 23:15 +0000
                Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 23:09 -0700
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-13 00:23 +0000
      Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-03-12 11:51 -0400
        Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-12 21:31 +0000
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 15:21 -0700
          Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-03-13 03:36 -0400
            Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-13 21:52 +0000
              Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-13 22:10 +0000
              Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-03-13 20:47 -0400
  Re: Word For Today: “Uglification” Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-12 06:15 +0000

csiph-web