Re: Baby X is bor nagain

From	Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Baby X is bor nagain
Date	2024-06-23 12:19 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<8734p3rjno.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <v50poh$2g4ha$1@dont-email.me> <87iky3svqh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <874j9nxsdy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <874j9ns382.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <86h6dlhb34.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>
>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> On a C language point, I don't think the standard says anything about
>>>> sorting with non-order functions like the one above.  Is an
>>>> implementation of qsort permitted to misbehave (for example by not
>>>> terminating) when the comparison function does not implement a proper
>>>> order relation?
>>>
>>> N1570 7.22.5p4 (applies to bsearch and qsort):
>>> """
>>> When the same objects (consisting of size bytes, irrespective of
>>> their current positions in the array) are passed more than once to
>>> the comparison function, the results shall be consistent with one
>>> another.  That is, for qsort they shall define a total ordering on
>>> the array, and for bsearch the same object shall always compare
>>> the same way with the key.
>>> """
>>>
>>> That's a "shall" outside a constraint, so violating it results in
>>> undefined behavior.
>>
>> I think it should be clearer.  What the "that is" phrase seems to
>> clarify in no way implies a total order, merely that the repeated
>> comparisons or the same elements are consistent with one another.  That
>> the comparison function defines a total order on the elements is, to me,
>> a major extra constraint that should not be written as an apparent
>> clarification to something the does not imply it:  repeated calls should
>> be consistent with one another and, in addition, a total order should be
>> imposed on the elements present.
>
> I think you're misreading the first sentence.

Let's hope so.  That's why I said it should be clearer, not that it was
wrong.

> Suppose we are in
> court listening to an ongoing murder trial.  Witness one comes in
> and testifies that Alice left the house before Bob.  Witness two
> comes in (after witness one has gone) and testifies that Bob left
> the house before Cathy.  Witness three comes in (after the first
> two have gone) and testifies that Cathy left the house before
> Alice.  None of the witnesses have contradicted either of the
> other witnesses, but the testimonies of the three witnesses are
> not consistent with one another.

My (apparently incorrect) reading of the first sentence is that the
consistency is only required between the results of multiple calls
between each pair.  In other words, if the witnesses are repeatedly
asked, again and again, if Alice left before Bob and/or if Bob left
before Alice the results would always be consistent (with, of course,
the same required of repeatedly asking about the other pairs of people).

> Try a web search
>
>     "consistent with" definition
>
> for more explanation.

Seriously?

> Also, for "one another", if we say the
> children in the Jones family get along with one another, we don't
> mean that each child gets along with at least one of the others,
> but instead mean that every child gets along with every other
> child, that is, that they all get along with each other.

The sentence in question has, to my mind, already stated what the "one
another" refers to -- the multiple calls between pairs containing the
same objects.  I get you think that's not the intended meaning, but I
get my reading so strongly that I struggle to see the other.

> Whether
> or not some other reading (of that problem sentence in the C
> standard) is sensible, surely the reading I have suggested is a
> plausible one.  Do you agree?  It seems clear, given how the
> second sentence is phrased, that this suggested reading is what
> was intended.

I still can't read it the way you do.  Every time I try, I find the
consistency is to be taken as applying to the results of the multiple
calls between pairs of the same objects.  Nothing more.  It starts with
"When the same objects".  It seems so clear that the consistency is all
about the multiple calls with these same objects.  I keep trying to see
your reading of it, but I can't.

> I don't mean to defend the quality of writing in this passage.
> Certainly it would be nice if the meaning could have been stated
> more plainly.  But I think it's an overstatement to say that the
> first sentence in no way implies a total order.

I have a second objection that promoted that remark.  If I take the
(apparently) intended meaning of the first sentence, I think that
"consistent" is too weak to imply even a partial order.  In dog club
tonight, because of how they get on, I will ensure that Enzo is walking
behind George, that George is walking behind Benji, Benji behind Gibson,
Gibson behind Pepper and Pepper behind Enzo.  In what sense is this
"ordering" not consistent?  All the calls to the comparison function are
consistent with each other.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-13 13:53 +0200
  Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-13 14:46 +0100
    Re: Baby X is bor nagain tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2024-06-13 17:11 +0200
      Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-13 16:32 +0100
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-14 08:47 +0200
    Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-13 19:13 +0300
  Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-13 17:43 +0300
    Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-14 18:43 +0200
      Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-14 19:24 +0100
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-15 12:35 +0200
    Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-17 02:22 -0400
      Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-17 07:30 +0000
        Are Javascript and Python similarly slow ? (Was: Baby X is bor nagain) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:11 +0300
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:25 +0300
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 10:54 -0700
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-17 15:23 +0200
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-18 11:56 +0300
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 14:36 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 14:48 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 18:11 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 17:38 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 18:54 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-18 14:14 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Mark Bourne <nntp.mbourne@spamgourmet.com> - 2024-06-18 20:52 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-18 16:07 -0400
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 15:30 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 18:15 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Mark Bourne <nntp.mbourne@spamgourmet.com> - 2024-06-18 21:09 +0100
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-18 18:40 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 17:39 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 15:49 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 10:25 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 12:42 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 17:52 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 19:49 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 21:42 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-19 22:51 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-20 12:34 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-20 14:37 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-20 17:07 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-20 17:58 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-20 20:28 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-20 20:11 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-20 22:16 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-20 23:40 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 10:02 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-20 09:55 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 09:37 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-20 13:18 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-20 12:24 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 13:36 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-20 22:26 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-20 08:05 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 17:56 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-20 17:45 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-20 13:55 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-20 19:01 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 13:41 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-20 21:34 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 13:44 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-06-20 22:21 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-20 22:34 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 11:19 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 13:37 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-20 22:39 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-21 00:56 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-21 22:07 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 14:57 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-20 20:59 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 18:42 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-21 21:10 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-23 12:19 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-23 10:30 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-23 11:04 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-23 23:33 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-24 03:28 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-25 01:35 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-25 05:38 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 16:33 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-24 07:40 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 14:25 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-23 09:47 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 19:55 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-24 09:34 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-23 23:30 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-24 01:53 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-25 01:30 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-26 12:59 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-26 23:46 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-26 17:48 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 13:23 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 07:44 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 02:27 -0700
                sort - C, python, C++, glibc  Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-19 13:17 +0300
                Re: sort - C, python, C++, glibc Was: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 12:53 +0200
                Re: sort - C, python, C++, glibc Was: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 18:42 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 07:39 +0200
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 03:26 -0400
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-20 21:13 +0100
      Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-17 11:30 +0100
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-17 15:43 +0200
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 16:48 +0100
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-17 18:21 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 20:17 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-17 21:29 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 22:06 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 08:44 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-20 21:21 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 11:46 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-21 11:42 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 15:34 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-21 22:47 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 14:25 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-23 19:21 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-23 22:09 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 00:52 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 01:25 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 00:56 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-24 10:28 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 12:17 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-24 13:46 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 14:01 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-26 11:54 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-24 10:16 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-24 16:09 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 15:00 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-24 17:09 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 17:19 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-24 19:15 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 17:25 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 20:29 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 22:15 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 21:34 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 22:03 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-25 10:19 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-25 12:18 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-25 17:08 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-26 00:28 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-26 09:17 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-25 12:52 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-25 20:39 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-25 16:28 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-26 00:23 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 13:13 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-26 09:23 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 15:18 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 15:45 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 12:04 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-26 09:21 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-26 08:31 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-25 13:15 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-25 12:56 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-24 18:10 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 17:51 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 17:02 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 18:50 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-24 18:10 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-24 20:33 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-25 11:36 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-25 13:48 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-25 15:56 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-25 15:08 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-25 17:12 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-25 16:59 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-25 16:27 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-25 19:51 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-25 18:11 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-26 00:42 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-26 09:35 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-26 13:15 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-27 12:16 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-27 15:24 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-27 14:13 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-27 14:31 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-27 17:28 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-27 21:51 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-27 22:47 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-28 03:23 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 11:19 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-28 10:26 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-29 15:14 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-29 08:38 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-29 17:11 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-29 19:42 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-29 21:49 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-29 15:43 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-30 01:43 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-30 11:23 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-30 00:36 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-07-03 17:12 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-30 01:49 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-29 18:46 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-29 20:55 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-30 12:18 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-30 17:54 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-30 19:10 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-07-01 00:20 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-29 16:23 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-29 10:47 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-29 12:11 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-30 11:05 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-30 11:48 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-30 17:47 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-01 12:22 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-01 13:09 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-01 15:14 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-01 14:20 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-02 16:00 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-02 16:44 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-03 00:58 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-03 01:23 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-07-03 00:47 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-07-03 01:18 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-03 01:54 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-07-03 09:08 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-03 10:36 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-07-03 09:41 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-03 17:58 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-03 21:33 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 09:14 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-03 22:58 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-07-04 10:24 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-07-04 10:18 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-07-03 11:23 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-03 13:13 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-28 06:56 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-28 11:20 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-28 13:52 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-29 11:05 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-29 09:15 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-29 19:11 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-29 18:51 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-29 21:56 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-30 11:17 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 11:05 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-28 06:57 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-27 13:23 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 15:44 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-27 17:50 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 00:16 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-27 23:58 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-27 18:21 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 11:15 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-28 13:53 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-27 18:08 -0700
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-06-28 03:30 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-28 11:11 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 11:41 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-28 13:48 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 15:36 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-28 15:48 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 20:37 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-28 15:42 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-28 16:01 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-28 19:45 +0300
                tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-01 20:09 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-07-01 12:14 -0700
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-01 14:48 -0700
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-01 15:09 -0700
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-02 11:54 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-02 12:22 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-02 16:27 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-02 15:18 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-02 17:55 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-03 13:57 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-07-02 06:50 -0700
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-07-02 06:47 -0700
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-07-02 11:50 -0400
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-07-02 10:35 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-02 14:33 +0000
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-02 15:43 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-02 18:17 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-02 16:32 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-02 18:45 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-07-02 17:12 +0100
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-03 00:42 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-04 00:04 +0300
                Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-03 21:07 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-27 23:24 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-28 00:44 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-24 20:41 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-28 19:39 +0300
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-26 11:31 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-26 16:43 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-17 22:01 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 09:01 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-17 19:52 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 11:26 +0200
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-17 20:24 +0100
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-18 14:40 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 14:55 +0100
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 09:39 -0400
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 14:58 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-18 14:33 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 13:02 -0400
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 19:06 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 11:07 -0700
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-18 19:22 +0100
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 16:34 -0700
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 10:05 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-19 11:52 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-19 19:53 +0200
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-20 21:31 +0100
            Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 12:46 +0200
              Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-21 14:25 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-21 15:51 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-21 19:43 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 14:56 +0200
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-06-23 15:22 +0000
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-21 22:05 +0100
                Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 15:11 +0200
      Re: Baby X is bor nagain Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 14:09 +0100
        Re: Baby X is bor nagain David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-17 18:38 +0200
          Re: Baby X is bor nagain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 03:28 -0400

csiph-web