Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #384113
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) |
| Date | 2024-03-30 10:39 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86h6gnipqb.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <uu109u$3798b$1@i2pn2.org> <uu3kqb$3i23g$1@dont-email.me> <kXeNN.99578$24ld.63941@fx07.iad> |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: > >> On 27.03.2024 12:35, fir wrote: >> >>> tell me, is while(T[l]<p & l<=r) the same as while((T[l]<p)&&(l<=r)) >> >> 1. As long as K&R precedences still hold you don't need the inner >> parentheses; '<' and '<=' has higher precedence than '&' and '&&'. > > While true, the parenthesis can be helpful to the reader > and have no adverse effects. Certainly extra parentheses can be helpful to some readers. Considered as a question of fact, the proposition that extra parentheses have no adverse effects is false. It may be the case that the adverse effects are thought to be unimportant relative to some proposed benefit, but that is a question of opinion rather than a question of fact.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-27 12:35 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-03-28 12:37 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 13:18 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-03-28 16:26 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 17:28 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-28 16:43 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 18:12 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-28 19:36 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 23:13 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-28 14:14 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-28 19:12 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-28 18:24 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-03-30 10:39 -0700
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-30 20:30 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-08 21:55 -0700
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-31 17:10 +0200
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-04-14 23:32 +0300
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2024-04-03 10:25 +1100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-04-03 16:35 +0200
csiph-web