Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #384134
| From | fir <fir@grunge.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) |
| Date | 2024-03-31 17:10 +0200 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <uubudh$3ktle$1@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | <uu109u$3798b$1@i2pn2.org> <uu3kqb$3i23g$1@dont-email.me> <kXeNN.99578$24ld.63941@fx07.iad> |
Scott Lurndal wrote: > Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: >> On 27.03.2024 12:35, fir wrote: >>> tell me, is while(T[l]<p & l<=r) the same as while((T[l]<p)&&(l<=r)) >> >> 1. As long as K&R precedences still hold you don't need the inner >> parentheses; '<' and '<=' has higher precedence than '&' and '&&'. > > While true, the parenthesis can be helpful to the reader > and have no adverse effects. > i think i will use the rule if the operator precedences are right (and here ARITHM < REL < LOG rule is ruight) i will not use parenthesis but when its wrong i will use them (probably even if they are not needed) if(!(i%16)) for example i must use it becouse if(!i%16) sadly and unproperly dont work
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-27 12:35 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-03-28 12:37 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 13:18 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-03-28 16:26 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 17:28 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-28 16:43 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 18:12 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-03-28 19:36 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-28 23:13 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-28 14:14 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-03-28 19:12 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-28 18:24 +0000
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-03-30 10:39 -0700
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-30 20:30 +0100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-08 21:55 -0700
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-03-31 17:10 +0200
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-04-14 23:32 +0300
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2024-04-03 10:25 +1100
Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r) fir <fir@grunge.pl> - 2024-04-03 16:35 +0200
csiph-web