Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)

From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)
Date	2024-06-05 21:24 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<865xumn1fb.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <v2voe7$3fr50$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605005916.00001b33@yahoo.com> <86a5jzmle1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605195159.00002f0e@yahoo.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:58:46 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>
>> I couldn't get the AES-based hash function to compile.  There
>> was a complaint about not being able to inline an 'always-inline'
>> function.  I played around with it for a while but didn't get
>> anywhere.
>
> Not that using my reference hash is particularly important (I needed it
> as a quick way to get something I could rely on;  you already have
> something else with similar properties) but it's still worth
> investigation.
>
> There are two possibilities:
> 1. gcc compiler's -march=native logic incorrectly detects CPU type on
> your computer.
> 2. you CPU really does not support AES instructions.
>
> If the former, you can force compiler's hand with -maes flag.
> If the later, then you can compile it, but wouldn't be able to run my
> "reference" hash function on this particular computer

I finally got it to work.  I tried -maes before, and it still
failed, but maybe I was using some other option that messed
things up.  In any case it works now, and the AES hash gives
great results AFAICT.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:04 +0200
  Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 09:24 -0700
    Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:36 +0200
      Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 10:20 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:39 +0200
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:54 +0200
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 08:07 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-05-28 11:07 +0100
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 10:10 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 11:27 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:26 -0700
          Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:27 -0700
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-02 10:45 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 12:42 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 12:35 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-02 16:02 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 10:50 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 18:02 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-04 11:38 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-04 22:10 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 16:34 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 17:46 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 17:54 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-03 17:24 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 20:16 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-03 19:48 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 22:41 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 22:51 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 16:51 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 17:01 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:25 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 19:50 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:31 +0200
        Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 00:59 +0300
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 11:10 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 12:34 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 12:05 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 13:11 +0300
          Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 08:58 -0700
            AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:51 +0300
              Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:24 -0700
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:59 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:40 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 11:00 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-17 00:56 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 13:35 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-16 04:38 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 12:34 -0700
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 20:53 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 13:35 +0200
              Re: Good hash for pointers Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-09 12:40 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 15:09 +0200
              Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 01:34 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-09 18:31 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-10 15:14 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 14:40 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-15 20:32 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 09:35 +0200

csiph-web