AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)

From	Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)
Date	2024-06-05 19:51 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<20240605195159.00002f0e@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2voe7$3fr50$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605005916.00001b33@yahoo.com> <86a5jzmle1.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:58:46 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> 
> I couldn't get the AES-based hash function to compile.  There
> was a complaint about not being able to inline an 'always-inline'
> function.  I played around with it for a while but didn't get
> anywhere.
> 

Not that using my reference hash is particularly important (I needed it
as a quick way to get something I could rely on; you already have
something else with similar properties) but it's still worth
investigation.

There are two possibilities:
1. gcc compiler's -march=native logic incorrectly detects CPU type on
your computer.
2. you CPU really does not support AES instructions.

If the former, you can force compiler's hand with -maes flag.
If the later, then you can compile it, but wouldn't be able to run my
"reference" hash function on this particular computer

What CPU are you using?

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:04 +0200
  Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 09:24 -0700
    Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:36 +0200
      Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 10:20 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:39 +0200
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:54 +0200
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 08:07 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-05-28 11:07 +0100
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 10:10 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 11:27 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:26 -0700
          Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:27 -0700
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-02 10:45 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 12:42 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 12:35 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-02 16:02 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 10:50 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 18:02 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-04 11:38 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-04 22:10 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 16:34 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 17:46 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 17:54 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-03 17:24 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 20:16 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-06-03 19:48 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 22:41 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 22:51 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 16:51 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-03 17:01 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:25 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 19:50 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:31 +0200
        Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 00:59 +0300
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 11:10 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 12:34 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 12:05 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 13:11 +0300
          Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 08:58 -0700
            AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:51 +0300
              Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:24 -0700
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:59 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:40 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 11:00 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-17 00:56 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
            Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 13:35 +0300
              Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-16 04:38 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 12:34 -0700
          Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 20:53 +0200
            Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 13:35 +0200
              Re: Good hash for pointers Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-09 12:40 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 15:09 +0200
              Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 01:34 +0100
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-09 18:31 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-10 15:14 +0300
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 14:40 +0200
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-15 20:32 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 09:35 +0200

csiph-web