Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #17063
| From | Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: usenet's usefulness |
| Date | 2026-05-07 12:44 +0100 |
| Organization | Frantic |
| Message-ID | <828q9vo35h.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <20260505.161237.7fe47fc0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <10tdrnn$pdnt$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.44651b9c2431724b9904b5@news.individual.net> |
Stan Brown <someone@example.com> writes: > * Trolls (even ones who post non-abusive but stupid and off-topic > stuff) are unblockable because it is so easy to shift fake names. Isn't this thread off-topic? I did a good job of filtering out all the flames and trolls from uk.politics.misc, but by the end of it there was nothing left. Gnus has some good features for filterning out cross-posted groups, and certain re-occuring themes in subjects. It would be good if Thunderbird could apply its spam filtering to newsgroups, or maybe it can these days?
Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
usenet's usefulness D <J@M> - 2026-05-05 16:12 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 23:21 +0800
Re: usenet's usefulness Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 14:25 -0500
Re: usenet's usefulness The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 16:08 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 14:56 +0700
Re: usenet's usefulness ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2026-05-07 03:59 +0000
Re: usenet's usefulness Nick <nick@koohii.invalid> - 2026-05-07 16:03 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2026-05-07 22:58 +0000
Re: usenet's usefulness JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 17:31 +0700
Re: usenet's usefulness Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2026-05-06 10:24 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 13:05 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-06 02:52 +0000
Re: usenet's usefulness "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-06 06:01 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 09:08 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid> - 2026-05-06 22:10 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-07 05:44 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 22:38 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2026-05-05 15:41 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 14:51 +0700
Re: usenet's usefulness not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-10 09:24 +1000
Re: usenet's usefulness Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-05-09 17:49 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-05-06 10:59 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2026-05-06 10:35 -0700
Re: usenet's usefulness sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2026-05-06 14:35 -0500
Re: usenet's usefulness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-06 21:30 +0000
Re: usenet's usefulness Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-05-07 21:08 +1000
Re: usenet's usefulness R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid> - 2026-05-06 22:16 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-06 21:29 +0000
Re: usenet's usefulness "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-05-07 13:34 +0200
Re: usenet's usefulness Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-07 12:44 +0100
Re: usenet's usefulness "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-05-07 14:26 +0200
csiph-web