Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2922
| From | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern |
| Date | 2011-04-15 02:43 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <8168e82bf280948bb58750b7b5e9632e@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d0c168880ff1c65dd84fc6d70778ddb2@ruby-forum.com> <fe2a1539e193df32600e0c6768313e7e@ruby-forum.com> |
@Kevin: Kevin Mahler wrote in post #992945: > ... > def define_foo(obj, clazz, method) > obj.singleton_class.class_eval do > define_method :foo do > Class.new do > define_method method do |*args| > clazz.send(method, obj, *args) > end > end.new > end > end > end That's some mighty fine code-fu -- back in the day I had no problem with metaprogramming constructs in scheme, but I'm not yet at ease with the syntax and class structure of Ruby. > Returning facade or proxy objects like this can be an elegant solution > to certain problems. It's rather high on the abstraction ladder, though, > and without knowing the context I would wonder if more direct solutions > are possible. Well, yes -- as per my previous post. Since you must call define_foo() for each object & method you want to cover, I don't see a lot of advantage to the approach. But it does show off Ruby's function defining tricks nicely. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 00:16 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 01:27 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-15 04:24 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 15:29 +0200
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 02:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 02:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 08:44 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:20 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Jesús Gabriel y Galán <jgabrielygalan@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 02:45 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-16 16:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 23:40 +0200
csiph-web