Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2949
| From | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern |
| Date | 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <9781d8dfa4b6039362d09f98e7b7036e@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d0c168880ff1c65dd84fc6d70778ddb2@ruby-forum.com> <7c9986702d2a6acd3748e6cca228d8da@ruby-forum.com> <BANLkTikFjzEuhMevuXJ6ZGSHA6h=MNTnjA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks everybody!!
@Jesús:
I like your suggestion. It is simple and does what I'm looking for.
@Robert K:
> I am sorry, I still do not understand your motivation to have a class
> method which receives an instance as first argument.
My motivation is that I was writing a lot of code like this:
module HasXattr
def xattr_reference(key); Xattr.xattr_reference(self, key); end
def xattr_store(key, value); Xattr.xattr_store(self, key, value);
end
def xattr_has_key?(key); Xattr.xattr_has_key?(self, key); end
def xattr_delete(key); Xattr.xattr_delete(self, key); end
...
end
.. and I thought to myself: this is Ruby. There must be a better way.
I guess I should have shown this concrete example earlier in the thread.
@Kevin:
> One of the problems with Ruby is that the syntax changes depending on
> the compile-time or run-time context, which is a totally arbitrary
> distinction.
As I said, I came from a scheme background where everything was
syntactically simple and life was simple. Ah, for those days. I guess
I should have said "that's mighty fine Ruby-fu", since your
understanding of Ruby far outstrips mine.
Again, thanks all...
- ff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 00:16 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 01:27 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-15 04:24 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 15:29 +0200
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 02:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 02:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 08:44 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:20 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Jesús Gabriel y Galán <jgabrielygalan@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 02:45 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-16 16:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 23:40 +0200
csiph-web