Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2949

Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern

From Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.ruby
Subject Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern
Date 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500
Organization Service de news de lacave.net
Message-ID <9781d8dfa4b6039362d09f98e7b7036e@ruby-forum.com> (permalink)
References <d0c168880ff1c65dd84fc6d70778ddb2@ruby-forum.com> <7c9986702d2a6acd3748e6cca228d8da@ruby-forum.com> <BANLkTikFjzEuhMevuXJ6ZGSHA6h=MNTnjA@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Thanks everybody!!

@Jesús:

I like your suggestion.  It is simple and does what I'm looking for.

@Robert K:
> I am sorry, I still do not understand your motivation to have a class
> method which receives an instance as first argument.

My motivation is that I was writing a lot of code like this:

module HasXattr
    def xattr_reference(key);  Xattr.xattr_reference(self, key); end
    def xattr_store(key, value); Xattr.xattr_store(self, key, value); 
end
    def xattr_has_key?(key); Xattr.xattr_has_key?(self, key); end
    def xattr_delete(key); Xattr.xattr_delete(self, key); end
    ...
end

.. and I thought to myself: this is Ruby.  There must be a better way. 
I guess I should have shown this concrete example earlier in the thread.

@Kevin:
> One of the problems with Ruby is that the syntax changes depending on
> the compile-time or run-time context, which is a totally arbitrary
> distinction.

As I said, I came from a scheme background where everything was 
syntactically simple and life was simple.   Ah, for those days.  I guess 
I should have said "that's mighty fine Ruby-fu", since your 
understanding of Ruby far outstrips mine.

Again, thanks all...

- ff

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 00:16 -0500
  Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 01:27 -0500
    Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-15 04:24 -0500
      Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500
        Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 15:29 +0200
  Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 02:14 -0500
    Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 02:43 -0500
      Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 08:44 -0500
    Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:20 -0500
      Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:43 -0500
  Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Jesús Gabriel y Galán <jgabrielygalan@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 02:45 -0500
  Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-16 16:14 -0500
    Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 23:40 +0200

csiph-web