Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2750575
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.censorship, comp.misc, comp.internet.services.google |
| Subject | Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ |
| Date | 2024-02-27 19:26 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <72bf8890-3823-6f44-ba30-08941194d4cd@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | <slaxrLlwGwaEENCMOFaWYEtzJunzGGZN@news.usenet.farm> <a89de6a3-33d0-4c9b-889e-0a92451ff03b@example.net> <20240227141457.df5ff2aec5dde3fde4839b18@g{oogle}mail.com> <60a7f133-7614-a5a2-40db-b3aa5e039161@example.net> <87plwi0vyi.fsf@yaxenu.org> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Julieta Shem wrote: > D <nospam@example.net> writes: > >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Anton Shepelev wrote: >> >>> D: >>> >>>> I would assume there is no iron clad proof of this. On the >>>> other hand, as I tell people I know who experienced the >>>> same due to gender or nationality, you don't want to >>>> remain at that company anyway so paradoxically you should >>>> be happy it happened so you can move on to a company that >>>> is more aligned with your values and interests. >>> >>> That's selfish. The existance of such companies is harmful >>> to the entire humanity, not only to persons with differing >>> values. >> >> No, it's rational. Companies are private property and therefore the >> owner may do with them what they wish. The market will sort out >> companies who reject competent employees in time, and companies who >> accept competent employees regardless of color will thrive. >> >> The entity that makes this a problem is the government. > > But isn't government put together by companies? > No it's politicians. What differentiates government and companies is that government govern countries and are back with violence. What defines a company is that it acts on markets and have customers who can voluntarily choose to do business or not with the company.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-02-27 07:18 +0000
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ nickname unavailable <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 23:36 -0800
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 11:21 +0100
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-02-27 14:14 +0300
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 15:05 +0100
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 12:26 -0300
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Trump Trump <patriot1@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:34 +0000
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 19:26 +0100
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 20:12 -0300
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-28 09:24 +0100
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-28 10:41 -0300
Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ the late Mark Wieber <"chronic.l oser"@dole-scr unging.shitbags.of.taft> - 2024-02-28 08:14 -0800
Re: Google employee barred from promotion for being a White man Corey <bigtrumpfailurex@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:32 +0000
csiph-web