Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2750575

Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’

From D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.censorship, comp.misc, comp.internet.services.google
Subject Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’
Date 2024-02-27 19:26 +0100
Organization i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID <72bf8890-3823-6f44-ba30-08941194d4cd@example.net> (permalink)
References <slaxrLlwGwaEENCMOFaWYEtzJunzGGZN@news.usenet.farm> <a89de6a3-33d0-4c9b-889e-0a92451ff03b@example.net> <20240227141457.df5ff2aec5dde3fde4839b18@g{oogle}mail.com> <60a7f133-7614-a5a2-40db-b3aa5e039161@example.net> <87plwi0vyi.fsf@yaxenu.org>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw



On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Julieta Shem wrote:

> D <nospam@example.net> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Anton Shepelev wrote:
>>
>>> D:
>>>
>>>> I would assume there is no iron clad proof of this. On the
>>>> other hand, as I tell people I know who experienced the
>>>> same due to gender or nationality, you don't want to
>>>> remain at that company anyway so paradoxically you should
>>>> be happy it happened so you can move on to a company that
>>>> is more aligned with your values and interests.
>>>
>>> That's selfish.  The existance of such companies is harmful
>>> to the entire humanity, not only to persons with differing
>>> values.
>>
>> No, it's rational. Companies are private property and therefore the
>> owner may do with them what they wish. The market will sort out
>> companies who reject competent employees in time, and companies who
>> accept competent employees regardless of color will thrive.
>>
>> The entity that makes this a problem is the government.
>
> But isn't government put together by companies?
>

No it's politicians. What differentiates government and companies is that 
government govern countries and are back with violence. What defines a 
company is that it acts on markets and have customers who can voluntarily 
choose to do business or not with the company.

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-02-27 07:18 +0000
  Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ nickname unavailable <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 23:36 -0800
  Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 11:21 +0100
    Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-02-27 14:14 +0300
      Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 15:05 +0100
        Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 12:26 -0300
          Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Trump Trump <patriot1@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:34 +0000
          Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 19:26 +0100
            Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 20:12 -0300
              Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-28 09:24 +0100
                Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-28 10:41 -0300
                Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ the late Mark Wieber <"chronic.l oser"@dole-scr unging.shitbags.of.taft> - 2024-02-28 08:14 -0800
        Re: Google employee barred from promotion for being a White man Corey <bigtrumpfailurex@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:32 +0000

csiph-web