Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’

From	D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups	alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.censorship, comp.misc, comp.internet.services.google
Subject	Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’
Date	2024-02-27 15:05 +0100
Organization	i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID	<60a7f133-7614-a5a2-40db-b3aa5e039161@example.net> (permalink)
References	<slaxrLlwGwaEENCMOFaWYEtzJunzGGZN@news.usenet.farm> <a89de6a3-33d0-4c9b-889e-0a92451ff03b@example.net> <20240227141457.df5ff2aec5dde3fde4839b18@g{oogle}mail.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Anton Shepelev wrote:

> D:
>
>> I would assume there is no iron clad proof of this. On the
>> other hand, as I tell people I know who experienced the
>> same due to gender or nationality, you don't want to
>> remain at that company anyway so paradoxically you should
>> be happy it happened so you can move on to a company that
>> is more aligned with your values and interests.
>
> That's selfish.  The existance of such companies is harmful
> to the entire humanity, not only to persons with differing
> values.

No, it's rational. Companies are private property and therefore the owner 
may do with them what they wish. The market will sort out companies who 
reject competent employees in time, and companies who accept competent 
employees regardless of color will thrive.

The entity that makes this a problem is the government.

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-02-27 07:18 +0000
  Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ nickname unavailable <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 23:36 -0800
  Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 11:21 +0100
    Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-02-27 14:14 +0300
      Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 15:05 +0100
        Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 12:26 -0300
          Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Trump Trump <patriot1@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:34 +0000
          Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-27 19:26 +0100
            Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-27 20:12 -0300
              Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-02-28 09:24 +0100
                Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2024-02-28 10:41 -0300
                Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’ the late Mark Wieber <"chronic.l oser"@dole-scr unging.shitbags.of.taft> - 2024-02-28 08:14 -0800
        Re: Google employee barred from promotion for being a White man Corey <bigtrumpfailurex@protonmail.com> - 2024-02-27 15:32 +0000

csiph-web