Re: Undecorated JFrame ve

From	"Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this>
Subject	Re: Undecorated JFrame ve
Message-ID	<70e13a29d0dc6@uwe> (permalink)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.gui
References	<1176885857.343242.176410@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Date	2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
Organization	TDS.net

Show all headers | View raw

  To: comp.lang.java.gui
robotiser@googlemail.com wrote:
>No answers. Does this mean that nobody knows of any reasons to use a
>JWindow instead of an undecorated JFrame, ...

I do not speak for others, but for my own part,
there are only some minor reasons..
1) One less line of code.
2) JFrame has some 'baggage' that is not required
for a (J)Window.  It inherits the methods of Frame, 
and has things like setDefaultCloseOperation().

-- 
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Message posted via http://www.javakb.com

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Undecorated JFrame versus robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:32 +0000
  Re: Undecorated JFrame ve robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
    Re: Undecorated JFrame ve "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000

csiph-web