Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #1312 > unrolled thread
| Started by | robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-27 15:32 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.gui
Undecorated JFrame versus robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:32 +0000
Re: Undecorated JFrame ve robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
Re: Undecorated JFrame ve "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
| From | robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Undecorated JFrame versus |
| Message-ID | <1175162297.038449.43950@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> |
To: comp.lang.java.gui I've only just discovered undecorated JFrames. Thy solve some of the problems I'd had with JWindows before, such as not being suitable parents for JDialogs. In fact, I don't have any reason to use JWindow at all any more. For the kind of things I do. Are there situations where it is better to use JWindow rather than JFrame? --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | robotiser@googlemail.com.remove-dii-this |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Undecorated JFrame ve |
| Message-ID | <1176885857.343242.176410@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #1312 |
To: comp.lang.java.gui No answers. Does this mean that nobody knows of any reasons to use a JWindow instead of an undecorated JFrame, or that everyone thinks that it's a stupid question that I should be able to work out myself? --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Undecorated JFrame ve |
| Message-ID | <70e13a29d0dc6@uwe> |
| In reply to | #1477 |
To: comp.lang.java.gui robotiser@googlemail.com wrote: >No answers. Does this mean that nobody knows of any reasons to use a >JWindow instead of an undecorated JFrame, ... I do not speak for others, but for my own part, there are only some minor reasons.. 1) One less line of code. 2) JFrame has some 'baggage' that is not required for a (J)Window. It inherits the methods of Frame, and has things like setDefaultCloseOperation(). -- Andrew Thompson http://www.athompson.info/andrew/ Message posted via http://www.javakb.com --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.gui
csiph-web