Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659890

Re: Anti-relativist

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Anti-relativist
Date 2024-12-27 23:51 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <676FAE1C.137A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <676B17D4.697B@ix.netcom.com> <BnWdnWr9ULmP0_b6nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@giganews.com> <676B863D.7825@ix.netcom.com> <676EF66B.6454@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In other words, ...
nobody can agree what time it is now because
nobody knows what time it is now.

Nobody.

Frame of reference is false reference.







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Let me put it this way..
> 
> There is only one thing
> that caused life on earth..
> 
> but with so many people trying to
> guess what that is, you get
> billions of different reasons.
> 
> But there is still only one reason.
> 
> Problem is...you have too many frames of references.
> 
> You need to first get rid of this 'thing' you call...'frames of
> reference'.
> 
> It creates too much misinformation.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > >
> > > Merry Christmas to you, too.  Happy Hanukkah
> > >
> > > Now go away
> >
> > The Truth is...
> >
> > there is no relativity between two clocks!
> >
> > There is no relation between two clocks.
> >
> > There are no forces between two clocks that
> > would in any way affect one clock from another.
> >
> > NOTHING! No relations to each other!!
> >
> > The Truth is...
> >
> > there is no relativity between two clocks!
> >
> > Does one clock slow the other clock down?
> >
> > Of course not!
> >
> > There is no relation between two clocks.
> >
> > Does one clock even care what time it is on the other clock????
> >
> > there is no relativity between two clocks
> >
> > And Ross, I don't recall giving you permission to post here...
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Anti-relativist?   in Einstein's day means anti-JewishPhysics
> > >
> > > dats wat dey used to call yous in einstein day.
> > >
> > > einstein cult deniers
> > >
> > > 'Jewish physics'
> > >
> > > "Galilean Electrodynamics"?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Einstein's Science
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein is prejudiced against any scientist who is
> > > not of his religion and race.
> > >
> > > As he once told a Catholic Priest "...your grasp of physics is
> > > 'abominable'."
> > >
> > > Which means :repugnantly hateful; detestable; loathsome
> > >
> > > despicable
> > > contemptible
> > > damnable
> > > cursed
> > > accursed
> > > diabolical
> > > disgusting
> > > revolting
> > > repellent
> > > repulsive
> > > offensive
> > > repugnant
> > > abhorrent
> > > reprehensible
> > > atrocious
> > > horrifying
> > > execrable
> > > foul
> > > vile
> > > wretched
> > > miserable
> > > horrible
> > > awful
> > > dreadful
> > > appalling
> > > abysmal
> > > brutal
> > > nauseating
> > > horrid
> > > nasty
> > > disagreeable
> > > unpleasant
> > > distasteful
> > > terrible
> > > shocking
> > > godawful
> > > beastly
> > >
> > > Einstein use a lot of hate speech on other scientist who are not
> > > of his religion and race.
> > >
> > > In other words, if you are not
> > > of his religion and race...then you are "No men of science,"
> > > EINSTEIN:"No men of science,"
> > >
> > > As you can see for yourself in this conversation he had with a
> > > reporter...
> > >
> > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> > >
> > > REPORTER:""Why were men of science opposed
> > > to your theory when you first made it
> > > known ?"
> > > EINSTEIN:"No men of science," he replied, em
> > > phasizing the last'word, "were against
> > > the theory."
> > > REPORTER:"But there was some opposition?"
> > > EINSTEIN:"Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> > > was purely political. Even the physicists who opposed my theory did so
> > > for
> > > political reasons?in my opinion, o'
> > > course."
> > > REPORTER:"What do you mean when you say
> > > the opposition was political?"
> > > EINSTEIN:"Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> > > answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""
> > >
> > > Okay, here is more of what Albert Einstein was thinking:
> > >
> > > Reporter: "Why were men of science opposed
> > > to your theory when you first made it
> > > known ?"
> > >
> > > Einstein: 'No fucking men of SCIENCE were against the theory.'
> > >
> > > Reporter: "But there was some opposition?"
> > >
> > > Einstein: 'Yeah, but that
> > > was motherfuckin purely political. Even those fucking physi-cists who
> > > opposed my theory did so for
> > > stupid political reasons, that's a fact jack.'
> > >
> > > Reporter: "What do you mean when you say
> > > the opposition was political?"
> > >
> > > Einstein: 'They are fuckin Anti-Semitics. Fuckin Jew Haters! Because
> > > they know I'm a fucking Jew.'
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Anti-relativist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-24 12:21 -0800
  Re: Anti-relativist Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 16:13 -0800
    Re: Anti-relativist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-24 20:12 -0800
      Re: Anti-relativist Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 11:10 -0800
      Re: Anti-relativist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-27 10:48 -0800
        Re: Anti-relativist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-27 23:51 -0800

csiph-web