Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #621065
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Too Many Clocks |
| Date | 2023-09-26 23:44 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <6513CF62.59D5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <650CA570.1A81@ix.netcom.com> <1qhfiw4.3wehuxwgk3zkN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <650D2082.2C17@ix.netcom.com> <hmu3hip1972dmakukfhgco654ve8sabfd0@4ax.com> <6513C67A.5A64@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:05:06 -0700, The Starmaker > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > >J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > I don't know > > >> > > > but somebody > > >> > > > messed up > > >> > > > somewhere... > > >> > > > too many clocks > > >> > > > running at > > >> > > > different times. > > >> > > > > >> > > Blame god for it, but while doing so, do remember > > >> > > that we live in the best of all possible worlds, > > >> > > > > >> > > Jan > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > "possible worlds"???? i don't even know what dat means.. > > >> > > >> Not surprised... > > >> > > >> Jan > > > > > > > > >Well, i never read a science fiction, (or any fiction book for that > > >matter) > > > > Now, let me explain dis... > > > > as a kid > > i would go to > > the library > > to read books. > > I would follow > > the > > Dewey Decimal System > > it had there. > > > > So, I would look at all > > the books between > > 001-999. > > > > There was a section > > in the back that had no > > Dewey Decimal System. > > It was called the Fiction section. > > It had no Dewey Decimal System > > numbers. > > It had no facts in it, or an Index, > > or anything resembling the > > Dewey Decimal System. > > > > Lot's of made up stuff. > > > > So, I didn't bother to > > this day with those > > type of books. > > > > That is where it belongs, in the back. > > > > I rather be a six year old > > learning how to dissemble a machine gun. > > > > > > > >but i like star-trek on tvee... > > > > > >but... > > > > > >Definition. A possible world is a complete way things might be. > > >Possible worlds are alternative worlds one of which is the actual world. > > >Philosophers use the notion of a possible world to define and discuss > > >ideas such as possibility or necessity. > > >https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+possible+worlds+theory > > > > > >and Philosphy books are too hard to read...it's confusing. > > > > > > > > >I live in a 'actual' world. There are no other worlds. > > > > > > > > >too many clocks > > >running at > > >different times, at > > >different rates.. > > >it's confusing. > > > > > >Does anybody know what time it is...now? > > > > > >Or does anybody got the right time? > > > > > > > > >I got to figure out what time it is now... > > > > > >i have to start counting from the > > >first 3 seconds. > > > > > >You know, at the beginning... > > > > > >tick, tick, tick.. > > > > > > > > >How many ticks are there from > > >the first second to...Now? > > > > > >Then I will have to correct time. > > > > I figure > > if I have a watch > > at the big bang... > > then I can set my watch > > to the first three seconds... > > and it should give the correct > > time it is now... > > > > (certainty it isn't the year 2023) > > > > That is 436 quadrillion, 117 trillion, 76 billion, 600 million seconds > > ago, > > https://81018.com/universeclock/ > > > > I just got > > to wind my watch > > 436 quadrillion, 117 trillion, 76 billion, 600 million seconds > > to know the correct time it is now. > > > > (certainty it isn't the year 2023) > > > > Nobody here has the correct time. > > > > Too many clocks! > > Now, I need to first set my watch for the in the beginning of the big > bang...before the first three seconds... > > was it Sunday or Monday? > > If I go by the beginning of the first week then that would be Monday, > right? It wasn't year one yet, or month, or week, or even day... > > an hour didn't even pass by yet...it was only the first three seconds. What I don't understand is why is it for yous peoples takings sooo longs to understands thats the earth is the same age of the universe? The exact same age! the exact same second... Now I have to set my watch from the very first second of the big bang to today to know what time it is...Now. nobody here on earth has the correct time. Too Many Clocks -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-21 11:04 +0200
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-21 22:59 +0200
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-21 22:05 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-21 23:02 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-25 14:43 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-26 23:06 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-26 23:44 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:53 -0500
Re: Too Many Clocks Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 22:50 -0700
Re: Too Many Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-21 23:00 -0700
csiph-web