Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2605536
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The best Rigger should win |
| Date | 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <636303DE.489F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <6361DB34.1A57@ix.netcom.com> <ed36ac33-6bfd-4200-9d09-6186f3b96da6n@googlegroups.com> <6362105A.4029@ix.netcom.com> <a07b46ad-7d13-4d71-bce6-40c7599eea38n@googlegroups.com> <6362B627.429F@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:37:50 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 7:51:08 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > In today's News... > > > > > > > > > > Pennsylvania court says undated ballots won't be counted > > > > > State Supreme Court orders election boards to preserve and 'refrain from counting' misdated or undated absentee ballots > > > > > https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pa-court-says-undated-ballots-wont-be-counted-rnc-scores-massive-win-in-election-integrity-lawsuit > > > > > > > > What makes you, or anyone else for that matter, think that this would give an advantage to either party? It seems to me that the odds of someone forgetting to date their ballot would be equally probable for voters of any party. What exactly is the goal of such a >thing? I suppose that more democrats vote by mail, but I am not at all sure why this would be the case. > > > > > Undated ballots is a method of adding a million votes to a party before, during, and after an election while they are still being counted. > > > > I don't think you understand that those ballots are alll time-stamped when they are received. It does not actually matter at all if the voter fills out the date or not. Any ballot stamped with a date later than the deadline isn't counted at all... > > I cannot believe you are actually posting from a science newsgroups filled with hackers, crackers, social engineers, computer viruses scientist, etc., > > anyone 3 year old knows how to change the Timeand Date stamp on his computer...don't tell be you cannot imagine how one changes a date on a manual date stamp???? (you use your little finger or toe.) > > > > > > > You take the undated/misdated ballots you have hidden under the table and you 'count' those in. You win the election. > > > In Counting there's is STRENGTH. > > > > You are clueless... > > > > > You can also print your own ballots using your inkject printer at home by printing on Blank Offical Ballot Paper. > > > > And where does one get "Blank Official Ballot Paper"? Perhaps you could also get some blank "Official US Currency Paper" while you are at it... > > And where does one get "Blank Official Ballot Paper" you ask???? You certaintly don't have "How To Rig an Election" knowledge. How many sheets do you want, 5, 10, a hundred thousand, a million? > It's laying around unused being passed around for whoever ask for some. You want some??? Do you know how to use an ink jet printer?? Because if you don't know how to change the > date on a manual date stamp machine... > > > > > > > > > > May the best Rigger win. > > > > If Democrats are indeed successfully rigging elections then Republicans would need to admit that Democrats are way smarter because it is a given that the Republicans would do the same thing if they could. All politicians are crooks at heart, see gerrymandering, for example, which is about as corrupt as you can get, next to lobbying... > > May the best rigger win. > > This is not about...Politics. This is about How To Hack the Election Systems. > > In Counting there's is STRENGTH. > > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large > > May the best rigger win. > > Like in the movie "The Sting".."what am I gonna do, accuse him of being a better cheater?" Also, the Pennsylvania court State Supreme Court ruling applies to ALL dates...including the date the ballot owner was suppose to fill out. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 14:40 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 15:41 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 15:51 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 15:54 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 16:18 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 16:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 16:32 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 16:44 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 16:56 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 17:00 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 18:44 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-19 22:57 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 11:52 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 12:22 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 12:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:51 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 11:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:45 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 21:47 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-04 07:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:14 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 11:04 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 15:09 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 17:57 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 23:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 23:20 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 11:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:34 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 11:32 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 12:54 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 13:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 15:47 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 20:18 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 01:37 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-17 17:09 -0600
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 12:23 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 16:21 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 11:36 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 11:46 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 11:58 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 12:13 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 12:37 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 12:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 12:58 -0700
How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-22 22:37 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 13:23 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 17:46 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 17:57 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 18:14 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:14 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 12:35 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 12:37 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 22:11 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 22:27 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 13:05 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:50 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 10:53 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 11:08 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 11:24 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 11:48 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2022-10-22 13:58 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2022-10-19 21:24 -0500
Re: The best Rigger should win marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2022-10-22 13:54 -0700
csiph-web