Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #593634
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) |
| Date | 2022-10-17 20:14 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <634E1A15.73C3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9f72f1fb-c401-435f-a5fd-472b76357b34n@googlegroups.com> |
Julio Di Egidio wrote: > > For the rubric Tom Roberts is a fucking resident disgrace, > and other amenities along that line. > > I am quoting from sci.physics.relativity since I doubt they'll let my > message through. And, this is my last post to Usenet anyway! > ESAD, you fucking monsters, I will just vouch for your extinction. > > On Monday, 17 October 2022 at 09:10:38 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote: > > On 10/16/22 7:09 AM, Richard Livingston wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 2:59:07 PM UTC-5, Austin Fearnley > > > wrote: > > >> [...] > > > > You are both overthinking this. > > No, they were both not even wrong!! And *you* > keep adding even more nonsense and confusion > on top of any actual answers and explanations > I happen to give, yet again... > > Everybody: I thought this as a moderated group > would be different, instead a post of mine on a > line of research for foundations was rejected as > "too speculative", meanwhile we have to endure > just this daily nonsense and institutional spam. > > I am out of here: Usenet is dead. > > *Plonk* > > Julio The only place in the world left for 'absolute free speech' is ...Usenet. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-17 02:46 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 20:14 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 21:01 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-10-17 21:50 -0700
Old fart, uber crank Pat Dolan is having wet dreams once again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:15 -0700
Re: Old fart, uber crank Pat Dolan is having wet dreams once again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:07 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:16 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:19 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:14 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 23:33 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:51 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 00:18 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:43 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 13:49 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:36 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:27 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-10-18 14:05 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-18 10:44 -0400
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 08:38 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-18 10:50 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:47 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-18 14:26 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-18 17:03 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-10-18 19:53 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-19 01:41 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-19 11:13 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 08:09 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-19 17:19 -0400
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 14:26 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 17:13 -0700
csiph-web