Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #593634

Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead)

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead)
Date 2022-10-17 20:14 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <634E1A15.73C3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <9f72f1fb-c401-435f-a5fd-472b76357b34n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> 
> For the rubric Tom Roberts is a fucking resident disgrace,
> and other amenities along that line.
> 
> I am quoting from sci.physics.relativity since I doubt they'll let my
> message through.  And, this is my last post to Usenet  anyway!
> ESAD, you fucking monsters, I will just vouch for your extinction.
> 
> On Monday, 17 October 2022 at 09:10:38 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 10/16/22 7:09 AM, Richard Livingston wrote:
> > > On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 2:59:07 PM UTC-5, Austin Fearnley
> > > wrote:
> > >> [...]
> >
> > You are both overthinking this.
> 
> No, they were both not even wrong!!  And *you*
> keep adding even more nonsense and confusion
> on top of any actual answers and explanations
> I happen to give, yet again...
> 
> Everybody: I thought this as a moderated group
> would be different, instead a post of mine on a
> line of research for foundations was rejected as
> "too speculative", meanwhile we have to endure
> just this daily nonsense and institutional spam.
> 
> I am out of here: Usenet is dead.
> 
> *Plonk*
> 
> Julio


The only place in the world left for 'absolute free speech' is
...Usenet.  


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-17 02:46 -0700
  Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 20:14 -0700
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 21:01 -0700
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-10-17 21:50 -0700
      Old fart, uber crank Pat Dolan is having wet dreams once again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:15 -0700
        Re: Old fart, uber crank Pat Dolan is having wet dreams once again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:07 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:16 -0700
        Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 22:19 -0700
        Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:14 -0700
          Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-17 23:33 -0700
            Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-17 23:51 -0700
              Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 00:18 -0700
                Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:43 -0700
                Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 13:49 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:36 -0700
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:27 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-10-18 14:05 +0200
        Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-18 10:44 -0400
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-10-18 08:38 -0700
  Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-18 10:50 +0200
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-18 02:47 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-18 14:26 +0200
  Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-18 17:03 -0500
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-10-18 19:53 -0700
    Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-10-19 01:41 -0700
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-19 11:13 +0200
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 08:09 -0700
        Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-19 17:19 -0400
      Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 14:26 -0700
        Re: Tom Roberts is a fucking disgrace (and Usenet is dead) "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-19 17:13 -0700

csiph-web