Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke
Date	2023-02-20 09:24 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<3vmccj-pd2v.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <tstifq$eckk$1@dont-email.me> <k5f83nF88adU2@mid.individual.net> <37138b20-bb30-4c53-b6a3-fb09bcb27918n@googlegroups.com> <tsuvtg$m3oe$1@dont-email.me> <432aab63-0086-4550-93ff-b9b413a3e7c8n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 10:49:51 UTC+5:30, Volney wrote:
>> On 2/19/2023 9:11 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> > On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 23:59:16 UTC+5:30, whodat wrote: 
>> >> On 2/19/2023 10:24 AM, Volney wrote: 
>> >>> On 2/19/2023 5:14 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> >>>> On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 14:35:15 UTC+5:30, Volney wrote: 
>> >>>>> On 2/18/2023 9:07 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> >>>>>> On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 04:30:45 UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote: 
>> >>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 11:33 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 12:31:46 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee 
>> >>>>>>>> wrote: 
>> >>>>>>>>> To maintain the wrong quantum theory of light, the schizophrenic 
>> >>>>>>>>> de Broglie hypothesis was created to give light a dual nature - 
>> >>>>>>>>> both particle and wave. What nonsense! 
>> >>>>>>>> Really, nothing could be more ridiculous except the theories of 
>> >>>>>>>> relativity leading to big bang bonkers. 
>> >>>>>>> And of course, the nearly isotropic[*] 3 degree kelvin background 
>> >>>>>>> radiation has nothing to do with this. 
>> >>>>>> 
>> >>>>>> Not at all. It is the sum of the radiation from all the stars. 
>> >>>>> Then it wouldn't be isotropic, would it. 
>> >>> 
>> >>>> Galaxies exist in clumps. 
>> >>> 
>> >>> Exactly. The background radiation certainly wouldn't look like 
>> >>> near-perfect black body radiation at 3 K, would it. 
> 
> That is just a bullshit slogan to maintain nonsense bigbang theories. They have to say some nonsense to justify extreme nonsense like e=mcc.

This "extreme nonsense" has been confirmed by innumerable experiments
crackpot.

Where is your experiment and data that would indicate otherwise
crackpot?

<snip remaining crackpot babble>

Thread

de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 17:31 -0800
  Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 17:54 -0800
  Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 19:13 -0800
    Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 19:37 -0800
      Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 21:28 -0800
        Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-13 07:50 -0800
  Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Trolidan7 <x@x.net> - 2023-02-15 23:28 -0800
    Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 00:13 -0800
      Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Trolidan7 <x@x.net> - 2023-02-16 07:08 -0800
        Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 07:58 -0800
          Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 08:15 -0800
            Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 08:52 -0800
              Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 09:07 -0800
            Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 14:11 -0500
              Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 11:28 -0800
              Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 11:39 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 20:37 -0500
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 17:50 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 18:25 -0800
      Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 07:51 -0800
        Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 11:41 -0800
          Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 11:53 -0800
  Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 04:33 -0800
    Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-17 07:48 -0800
    Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-02-19 10:00 +1100
      Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 18:07 -0800
        Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 04:05 -0500
          Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 02:14 -0800
            Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 11:24 -0500
              Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-19 12:29 -0600
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 18:11 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-19 18:36 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 00:19 -0500
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-20 00:22 -0600
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 00:21 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 00:21 -0800
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 12:12 -0500
                Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-20 09:24 -0800
  Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 17:20 -0800
    Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 21:46 -0800

csiph-web