Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #869646
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke |
| Date | 2023-02-12 19:37 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vrnobj-rfs9.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink) |
| References | <f6ea0168-4cd8-4a94-9429-ff7426368be9n@googlegroups.com> <abd2d62e-b565-4e80-a312-237a7fdd4354n@googlegroups.com> |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 07:01:46 UTC+5:30, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> To maintain the wrong quantum theory of light, the schizophrenic de Broglie hypothesis was created to give light a dual nature - both particle and wave. What nonsense! > > Every thin dipole disproves this stupid hypothesis. If energy moved as particles, very little of it would be captured by a thin dipole receiving antenna. Yep, zero understanding of what the dual nature of light means, which is typical of a crackpot.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 17:31 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 17:54 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 19:13 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 19:37 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 21:28 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-13 07:50 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Trolidan7 <x@x.net> - 2023-02-15 23:28 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 00:13 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Trolidan7 <x@x.net> - 2023-02-16 07:08 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 07:58 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 08:15 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 08:52 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 09:07 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 14:11 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 11:28 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 11:39 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 20:37 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 17:50 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 18:25 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 07:51 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 11:41 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-16 11:53 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 04:33 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-17 07:48 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-02-19 10:00 +1100
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 18:07 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 04:05 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 02:14 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 11:24 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-19 12:29 -0600
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 18:11 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-19 18:36 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 00:19 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-20 00:22 -0600
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 00:21 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 00:21 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 12:12 -0500
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-20 09:24 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 17:20 -0800
Re: de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 21:46 -0800
csiph-web