Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582128
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-07 07:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <399dc474-eefb-4bb0-97df-e603c60f293an@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Geodesy |
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
Basically looking at world lines in collision, basically for the world lines through the center of the collision, or the layers. In one case, from collision the pressure, moves out all the world lines from meeting in parallel, to diverging in parallel. In the other, the collision makes the world lines as meeting in parallel, to meet or to meet in parallel. Then, it seems the geodesy is between, when collisions are poles and when collisions are not poles, where poles are points or particles, in the space-frame. That the geodesy is between the impulse moments and around the impulse moments, is then that the impulse moments in the geodesy, result in terms between those bounds, what makes for the region, its statistical content, in momentae, or statistics in time, this is what I am looking at to model super-gravity in space-contraction. Which is all very usual .... So, "space-time and geometry", are lifted as the effective, over the effective field equations, left back in the effective field equations, as a tendency to equilibrium. Then for "geodesy", world-line, it's still sum-of-histories and all, it's a "unified theory".
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 07:32 -0700
Re: Geodesy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 14:39 +0000
Re: Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 09:28 -0700
Re: Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 18:15 -0700
csiph-web