Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582128

Geodesy

Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Date 2022-04-07 07:32 -0700
Message-ID <399dc474-eefb-4bb0-97df-e603c60f293an@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Geodesy
From "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Basically looking at world lines in collision, basically for the world lines through the 
center of the collision, or the layers.  In one case, from collision the pressure, moves 
out all the world lines from meeting in parallel, to diverging in parallel.  In the other, 
the collision makes the world lines as meeting in parallel, to meet or to meet in parallel.
Then, it seems the geodesy is between, when collisions are poles and when collisions 
are not poles, where poles are points or particles, in the space-frame.  That the geodesy 
is between the impulse moments and around the impulse moments, is then that 
the impulse moments in the geodesy, result in terms between those bounds, what 
makes for the region, its statistical content, in momentae, or statistics in time, 
this is what I am looking at to model super-gravity in space-contraction.

Which is all very usual ....

So, "space-time and geometry", are lifted as the effective, over the effective field equations, 
left back in the effective field equations, as a tendency to equilibrium.

Then for "geodesy", world-line, it's still sum-of-histories and all, it's a "unified theory".

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 07:32 -0700
  Re: Geodesy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 14:39 +0000
    Re: Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 09:28 -0700
      Re: Geodesy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 18:15 -0700

csiph-web